Literature DB >> 12661645

Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: effects on tympanic temperature.

M S Davis1, T L Mader, S M Holt, A M Parkhurst.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different management strategies on body temperature of feedlot steers finished in the summer months. In Exp. 1, 24 crossbred steers were chosen to assess the effect of altered feed intake and feeding time on tympanic temperature (TT) response. Managed feeding (MF) treatments were applied for 22 d only and provided 1) ad libitum access to feed at 0800 (ADLIB), 2) feed at 1600 with amount adjusted so that no feed was available at 0800 (BKMGT), 3) feed at 1600 at 85% of predicted ad libitum levels (LIMFD). During heat stress conditions on d 20 to 22 of MF, LIMFD and BKMGT had lower (P < 0.05) TT than ADLIB from 2100 through 2400. A carryover effect of limit-feeding was evident during a severe heat episode (d 36 to 38) with LIMFD steers having lower (P < 0.05) TT than ADLIB. In Exp. 2, TT were obtained from 24 crossbred steers assigned to three treatments, consisting of no water application (CON), water applied to feedlot mound surfaces from 1000 to 1200 (AM) or 1400 to 1600 (PM). From 2200 to 0900 and 1200 to 1400, steers assigned to morning sprinkling treatment had lower (P < 0.05) TT than steers assigned to afternoon sprinkling treatment. In Exp. 3, 24 steers were utilized in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with factors of feeding time [0800 (AMF) and 1400 (PMF)] and sprinkling (WET and DRY). Tympanic temperatures were monitored under hot environmental conditions on d 30 to 32 and 61 to 62. A feeding time x sprinkling interaction (P < 0.001) was evident on d 30 to 32, although AMF/DRY steers had the highest (P < 0.05) TT. On d 61 to 62, TT of PMF steers was higher (P < 0.05) than AMF between 1500 to 1800. Use of sprinklers can effectively reduce TT of feedlot cattle, whereas shifting to an afternoon vs morning feeding time was most beneficial when bunks were empty several hours prior to feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12661645     DOI: 10.2527/2003.813649x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Effect of sprinkling on feedlot microclimate and cattle behavior.

Authors:  T L Mader; M S Davis; J B Gaughan
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Alternative body sites for heat stress measurement in milking cows under tropical conditions and their relationship to the thermal discomfort of the animals.

Authors:  Luciane S Martello; Holmer Savastano; Saulo L Silva; Júlio Cesar C Balieiro
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Model for understanding thermal hysteresis during heat stress: a matter of direction.

Authors:  A M Parkhurst
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Seasonal variation in coat characteristics, tick loads, cortisol levels, some physiological parameters and temperature humidity index on Nguni cows raised in low- and high-input farms.

Authors:  C L F Katiyatiya; V Muchenje; A Mushunje
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Effect of heat stress on rumen temperature of three breeds of cattle.

Authors:  A M Lees; J C Lees; A T Lisle; M L Sullivan; J B Gaughan
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Short communication: using infrared thermography as an in situ measure of core body temperature in lot-fed Angus steers.

Authors:  Angela M Lees; J C Lees; V Sejian; A L Wallage; J B Gaughan
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Reducing rumen starch fermentation of wheat with three percent sodium hydroxide has the potential to ameliorate the effect of heat stress in grain-fed wethers.

Authors:  P A Gonzalez-Rivas; K DiGiacomo; P A Giraldo; B J Leury; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Hormonal growth-promotant effects on grain-fed cattle maintained under different environments.

Authors:  J B Gaughan; W M Kreikemeier; T L Mader
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 3.787

9.  Tympanic temperature in confined beef cattle exposed to excessive heat load.

Authors:  T L Mader; J B Gaughan; L J Johnson; G L Hahn
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Relationship between Rectal Temperature and Vaginal Temperature in Grazing Bos taurus Heifers.

Authors:  Angela M Lees; Jim M Lea; Hannah E Salvin; Linda M Cafe; Ian G Colditz; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.