Literature DB >> 15687808

Online health communication about human genetics: perceptions and preferences of internet users.

Jay M Bernhardt1, Jacqueline McClain, Roxanne L Parrott.   

Abstract

Unprecedented advancements in human genetics research necessitate keeping the public abreast of new information, applications, and implications and the Internet represents an important method of communicating with the public. Our research used cross-sectional self-report survey data collected from a diverse convenience sample of 780 Internet users in two states. Multivariate regression analysis explored the relationships between experiences, perceptions, and preferences for online health and genetics communication. Online health information seeking was associated with previous genetic information seeking, comfort with online genetic communication, perceived risk for genetic abnormality, being female, and having more education. Comfort with online genetics communication was associated with a preference for online genetic information, previous online health and off-line genetics information seeking, having a healthy lifestyle, believing in the positive impact of human genetics research, and being female. Perceiving online health information to be accurate was associated with preferring the Internet for genetics communication, being older, less educated, and perceiving Internet use as anonymous. Preferring online genetics communication to other communication channels was associated with perceiving online health information as accurate, being comfortable receiving online genetics information, having lower intrinsic religiosity, and being male. The implications of findings for Web-based health message design are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15687808     DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav        ISSN: 1094-9313


  9 in total

1.  The role of genetics in the provision of essential public health services.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Carolyn Watts
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Interaction of Comparative Cancer Risk and Cancer Efficacy Perceptions on Cancer-Related Information Seeking and Scanning Behaviors.

Authors:  Norman C H Wong
Journal:  Commun Res Rep       Date:  2012-07

4.  Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Ryan S Paquin; Adam S Richards; Laura M Koehly; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  "I am pregnant and my husband has diabetes. Is there a risk for my child?" A qualitative study of questions asked by email about the role of genetic susceptibility to diabetes.

Authors:  Suzanne C M van Esch; Martina C Cornel; Frank J Snoek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research.

Authors:  Leah R Abrams; Colleen M McBride; Gillian W Hooker; Joseph N Cappella; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.