Literature DB >> 15687294

Mapping segmental and sequence variations among laboratory mice using BAC array CGH.

Antoine M Snijders1, Norma J Nowak, Bing Huey, Jane Fridlyand, Sindy Law, Jeffrey Conroy, Taku Tokuyasu, Kubilay Demir, Readman Chiu, Jian-Hua Mao, Ajay N Jain, Steven J M Jones, Allan Balmain, Daniel Pinkel, Donna G Albertson.   

Abstract

We used arrays of 2069 BACs (1303 nonredundant autosomal clones) to map sequence variation among Mus spretus (SPRET/Ei and SPRET/Glasgow) and Mus musculus (C3H/HeJ, BALB/cJ, 129/J, DBA/2J, NIH, FVB/N, and C57BL/6) strains. We identified 80 clones representing 74 autosomal loci of copy number variation (|log(2)ratio| >/= 0.4). These variant loci distinguish laboratory strains. By FISH mapping, we determined that 63 BACs mapped to a single site on C57BL/6J chromosomes, while 17 clones mapped to multiple chromosomes (n = 16) or multiple sites on one chromosome (n = 1). We also show that small ratio changes (Delta log(2)ratio approximately 0.1) distinguish homozygous and heterozygous regions of the genome in interspecific backcross mice, providing an efficient method for genotyping progeny of backcrosses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687294      PMCID: PMC546532          DOI: 10.1101/gr.2902505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  42 in total

Review 1.  Implications of human genome architecture for rearrangement-based disorders: the genomic basis of disease.

Authors:  Christine J Shaw; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis defines haplotype patterns in mouse.

Authors:  Tim Wiltshire; Mathew T Pletcher; Serge Batalov; S Whitney Barnes; Lisa M Tarantino; Michael P Cooke; Hua Wu; Kevin Smylie; Andrey Santrosyan; Neal G Copeland; Nancy A Jenkins; Francis Kalush; Richard J Mural; Richard J Glynne; Steve A Kay; Mark D Adams; Colin F Fletcher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genomic segmental polymorphisms in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Jiangzhen Li; Tao Jiang; Jian-Hua Mao; Allan Balmain; Leif Peterson; Charles Harris; Pulivarthi H Rao; Paul Havlak; Richard Gibbs; Wei-Wen Cai
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Co-duplication of olfactory receptor and MHC class I genes in the mouse major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  Claire Amadou; Ruth M Younger; Sarah Sims; Lucy H Matthews; Jane Rogers; Attila Kumanovics; Andreas Ziegler; Stephan Beck; Kirsten Fischer Lindahl
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Identification of Stk6/STK15 as a candidate low-penetrance tumor-susceptibility gene in mouse and human.

Authors:  Amanda Ewart-Toland; Paraskevi Briassouli; John P de Koning; Jian-Hua Mao; Jinwei Yuan; Florence Chan; Lucy MacCarthy-Morrogh; Bruce A J Ponder; Hiroki Nagase; John Burn; Sarah Ball; Maria Almeida; Spiros Linardopoulos; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Recent segmental duplications in the working draft assembly of the brown Norway rat.

Authors:  Eray Tuzun; Jeffrey A Bailey; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Location of genes coding for 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA within the genome of Mus musculus.

Authors:  S M Elsevier; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-10-14       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Genome-wide amplifications caused by chromosomal rearrangements play a major role in the adaptive evolution of natural yeast.

Authors:  Juan J Infante; Kenneth M Dombek; Laureana Rebordinos; Jesús M Cantoral; Elton T Young
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  BAC microarray analysis of 15q11-q13 rearrangements and the impact of segmental duplications.

Authors:  D P Locke; R Segraves; R D Nicholls; S Schwartz; D Pinkel; D G Albertson; E E Eichler
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Large-scale variation among human and great ape genomes determined by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Devin P Locke; Richard Segraves; Lucia Carbone; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  29 in total

1.  Assessing metabolic stress and autophagy status in epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Robin Mathew; Vassiliki Karantza-Wadsworth; Eileen White
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes.

Authors:  Charlotte N Henrichsen; Nicolas Vinckenbosch; Sebastian Zöllner; Evelyne Chaignat; Sylvain Pradervand; Frédéric Schütz; Manuel Ruedi; Henrik Kaessmann; Alexandre Reymond
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds.

Authors:  George E Liu; Yali Hou; Bin Zhu; Maria Francesca Cardone; Lu Jiang; Angelo Cellamare; Apratim Mitra; Leeson J Alexander; Luiz L Coutinho; Maria Elena Dell'Aquila; Lou C Gasbarre; Gianni Lacalandra; Robert W Li; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Dan Nonneman; Luciana C de A Regitano; Tim P L Smith; Jiuzhou Song; Tad S Sonstegard; Curt P Van Tassell; Mario Ventura; Evan E Eichler; Tara G McDaneld; John W Keele
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Significant gene content variation characterizes the genomes of inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Gene Cutler; Lisa A Marshall; Ni Chin; Helene Baribault; Paul D Kassner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Lgals6, a 2-million-year-old gene in mice: a case of positive Darwinian selection and presence/absence polymorphism.

Authors:  Denis Houzelstein; Isabelle R Gonçalves; Annie Orth; François Bonhomme; Pierre Netter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Extensive genomic copy number variation in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Qi Liang; Nathalie Conte; William C Skarnes; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Copy number variation in the bovine genome.

Authors:  João Fadista; Bo Thomsen; Lars-Erik Holm; Christian Bendixen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Copy number variation in the mouse genome: implications for the mouse as a model organism for human disease.

Authors:  G Cutler; P D Kassner
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  A common and unstable copy number variant is associated with differences in Glo1 expression and anxiety-like behavior.

Authors:  Richard Williams; Jackie E Lim; Bettina Harr; Claudia Wing; Ryan Walters; Margaret G Distler; Meike Teschke; Chunlei Wu; Tim Wiltshire; Andrew I Su; Greta Sokoloff; Lisa M Tarantino; Justin O Borevitz; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The impact of copy number variation on local gene expression in mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Patrick Cahan; Yedda Li; Masayo Izumi; Timothy A Graubert
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.