Literature DB >> 15687093

Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis in four tree species in a temperate rainforest dominated by Dacrydium cupressinum in New Zealand.

David T Tissue1, Kevin L Griffin, Matthew H Turnbull, David Whitehead.   

Abstract

We assessed the relative limitations to photosynthesis imposed by stomatal and non-stomatal processes in Dacrydium cupressinum Lamb. (Podocarpaceae), which is the dominant species in a native, mixed conifer-broad-leaved rainforest in New Zealand. For comparison, we included three co-occurring broad-leaved tree species (Meterosideros umbellata Cav. (Myrtaceae), Weinmannia racemosa L.f. (Cunoniaceae) and Quintinia acutifolia Kirk (Escalloniaceae)) that differ in phylogeny and in leaf morphology from D. cupressinum. We found that low foliage phosphorus content on an area basis (P(a)) limited light-saturated photosynthesis on an area basis (A(sat)) in Q. acutifolia. Depth in the canopy did not generally affect A(sat) or the relative limitations to A(sat) because of stomatal and non-stomatal constraints, despite reductions in the ratio of foliage mass to area, foliar nitrogen on an area basis (N(a)) and P(a) with depth in the canopy. In the canopy-dominant conifer D. cupressinum, A(sat) was low, consistent with low values of the maximum rate of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) carboxylation (V(cmax)). In comparison, the A(sat) response of the three broad-leaved tree species was quite variable. Although A(sat) was high in the canopy-dominant M. umbellata, it was low in the sub-canopy trees W. racemosa and Q. acutifolia. Relative stomatal limitation to photosynthesis was more pronounced in W. racemosa (40%) than in the other three species (28-33%). Despite differences in degree, non-stomatal limitation to A(sat) predominated in all tree species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15687093     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.4.447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  6 in total

1.  Maintenance of C sinks sustains enhanced C assimilation during long-term exposure to elevated [CO2] in Mojave Desert shrubs.

Authors:  Iker Aranjuelo; Allison L Ebbets; R Dave Evans; David T Tissue; Salvador Nogués; Natasja van Gestel; Paxton Payton; Volker Ebbert; Williams W Adams; Robert S Nowak; Stanley D Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Photosynthesis and reflectance indices for rainforest species in ecosystems undergoing progression and retrogression along a soil fertility chronosequence in New Zealand.

Authors:  David Whitehead; Natalie T Boelman; Matthew H Turnbull; Kevin L Griffin; David T Tissue; Margaret M Barbour; John E Hunt; Sarah J Richardson; Duane A Peltzer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Photosynthetic regulation in seed heads and flag leaves of sagebrush-steppe bunchgrasses.

Authors:  Erik P Hamerlynck; Elsie M Denton; Kirk W Davies; Chad S Boyd
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits - V cmax and J max - to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: a meta-analysis and modeling study.

Authors:  Anthony P Walker; Andrew P Beckerman; Lianhong Gu; Jens Kattge; Lucas A Cernusak; Tomas F Domingues; Joanna C Scales; Georg Wohlfahrt; Stan D Wullschleger; F Ian Woodward
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Responses of sap flow, leaf gas exchange and growth of hybrid aspen to elevated atmospheric humidity under field conditions.

Authors:  Aigar Niglas; Priit Kupper; Arvo Tullus; Arne Sellin
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.276

Review 6.  Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: Scaling Up and Scaling Down in Crops.

Authors:  Marouane Baslam; Toshiaki Mitsui; Michael Hodges; Eckart Priesack; Matthew T Herritt; Iker Aranjuelo; Álvaro Sanz-Sáez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.