Literature DB >> 15685279

The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study.

Martha R Harris1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: QUESTION/
SETTING: Although the systematic review has become a research standard, little information addresses the actions of the librarian on a systematic review team.
METHOD: This article is an observational case study that chronicles a librarian's required involvement, skills, and responsibilities in each stage of a real-life systematic review. MAIN
RESULTS: Examining the review process reveals that the librarian's multiple roles as an expert searcher, organizer, and analyzer form an integral part of the Cochrane Collaboration's criteria for conducting systematic reviews. Moreover, the responsibilities of the expert searcher directly reflect the key skills and knowledge depicted in the "Definition of Expert Searching" section of the Medical Library Association's policy statement, "Role of Expert Searching in Health Sciences Libraries."
CONCLUSION: Although the librarian's multiple roles are important in all forms of medical research, they are crucial in a systematic review. As an expert searcher, the librarian must interact with the investigators to develop the terms required for a comprehensive search strategy in multiple appropriate sources. As an organizer and analyzer, the librarian must effectively manage the articles and document the search, retrieval, and archival processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15685279      PMCID: PMC545126     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 1536-5050


  11 in total

1.  Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.

Authors:  K G Shojania; L A Bero
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

2.  Defining and managing chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; G Ramirez; J E Cornell; K Allsup
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  Searching for evidence in perioperative nursing.

Authors:  M R Harris
Journal:  Semin Perioper Nurs       Date:  2000-07

4.  Management of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; E Chiquette; R L Ferrer; B M Sibai; K R Stevens; M Harris; K A Montgomery; K Stamm
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2000-08

Review 5.  Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions.

Authors:  David Evans
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 6.  Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.

Authors:  Jessie McGowan; Margaret Sampson
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-01

7.  Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.

Authors:  D J Cook; C D Mulrow; R B Haynes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.

Authors:  K Dickersin; R Scherer; C Lefebvre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-12

9.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

10.  Librarian participation in meta-analysis projects.

Authors:  T L Mead; D T Richards
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1995-10
View more
  22 in total

1.  How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.

Authors:  Julie M Glanville; Carol Lefebvre; Jeremy N V Miles; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-04

2.  Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Adriana Yoshii; Daphne A Plaut; Kathleen A McGraw; Margaret J Anderson; Kay E Wellik
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-01

Review 3.  New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990-2012.

Authors:  I Diane Cooper; Janet A Crum
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2013-10

4.  An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Ganesh Raghu; Harold R Collard; Jim J Egan; Fernando J Martinez; Juergen Behr; Kevin K Brown; Thomas V Colby; Jean-François Cordier; Kevin R Flaherty; Joseph A Lasky; David A Lynch; Jay H Ryu; Jeffrey J Swigris; Athol U Wells; Julio Ancochea; Demosthenes Bouros; Carlos Carvalho; Ulrich Costabel; Masahito Ebina; David M Hansell; Takeshi Johkoh; Dong Soon Kim; Talmadge E King; Yasuhiro Kondoh; Jeffrey Myers; Nestor L Müller; Andrew G Nicholson; Luca Richeldi; Moisés Selman; Rosalind F Dudden; Barbara S Griss; Shandra L Protzko; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Benchmarking participation of Canadian university health sciences librarians in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy; Catherine Boden
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-04

6.  Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews.

Authors:  Deborah Meert; Nazi Torabi; John Costella
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-10

7.  Integrating research into practice.

Authors:  Jonathan D Eldredge
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-10

8.  The Research Role of the Librarian at a Community Health Hackathon - A Technical Report.

Authors:  Nancy Shin; Kathryn Vela; Kelly Evans
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens; Joe Hilgard; Janneke Staaks
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-05-31

10.  Systematic review automation technologies.

Authors:  Guy Tsafnat; Paul Glasziou; Miew Keen Choong; Adam Dunn; Filippo Galgani; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.