Literature DB >> 15685040

A phase III trial evaluating the combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and radiation therapy with or without tamoxifen in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study (9235).

Edward F McClay1, Jeff Bogart, James E Herndon, Dee Watson, Lisa Evans, Steven L Seagren, Mark R Green.   

Abstract

Based on both clinical and laboratory data that suggested that tamoxifen (TAM) enhanced the effectiveness of cisplatin (DDP)-based chemotherapy regimens, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) designed and initiated a prospective, randomized phase III trial to test the efficacy of the addition of high-dose TAM to a standard chemoradiation regimen of DDP and etoposide (VP-16) in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Between August 6, 1993, and January 15, 1999, 319 patients with LSSCLC were accrued to CALGB 9235. Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with or without high-dose TAM. Treatment on the non-TAM containing arm (arm 1) included DDP (80 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 only) and VP-16 (80 mg/m2 intravenously days 1-3) given every 3 weeks for a total of 5 cycles. Patients treated on arm 2 received the identical chemotherapy regimen as described here with the addition of high-dose TAM (80 mg orally twice per day), which was given for 5 days each cycle starting 1 day before the DDP. Thoracic radiation (XRT) given at 200 cGy 5 days per week to a total dose of 50 Gy began on day 1 of cycle 4 of chemotherapy and overlapped with cycle 5. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was offered to all patients who achieved a complete response or near-complete response. A total of 307 patients are evaluable for response. After the completion of the chemoradiation portion of the treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) was 88% for 154 patients treated without tamoxifen and 84% for 153 patients treated with tamoxifen with complete response (CR) rates of 49% and 50%, respectively. The median failure-free survivals of 12.3 months and 10.5 months and the overall survivals of 20.6 months and 18.4 months, respectively, were not statistically significant between the 2 arms. Toxicity was similar with and without tamoxifen. This phase III trial failed to demonstrate a positive effect on either the response or survival for the addition of TAM to standard etoposide-cisplatin-radiation management for patients with LS-SCLC. However, these data continue to support a positive effect of chemoradiation in the treatment of patients with LS-SCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15685040     DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000139940.52625.d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  15 in total

Review 1.  Limited-stage small cell lung cancer: current chemoradiotherapy treatment paradigms.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe; Elizabeth M Gore
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-02-09

Review 2.  Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Sun; L D Durocher-Allen; P M Ellis; Y C Ung; J R Goffin; K Ramchandar; G Darling
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Lung cancer in women: role of estrogens.

Authors:  Subhankar Chakraborty; Apar Kishor Ganti; Alissa Marr; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn; Susan Halabi; Sumithra Mandrekar; James J Dignam
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Sensitivity of Medicare claims data for measuring use of standard multiagent chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Lan Lan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Differences in clinical trial patient attributes and outcomes according to enrollment setting.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Laura Archer; Lan Lan; Gary M Strauss; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Harvey B Niell; L Herbert Maurer; Michael P Kosty; Antonius A Miller; Gerald H Clamon; Anthony D Elias; Edward F McClay; Everett E Vokes; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Interruptions of once-daily thoracic radiotherapy do not correlate with outcomes in limited stage small cell lung cancer: analysis of CALGB phase III trial 9235.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bogart; Dorothy Watson; Edward F McClay; Lisa Evans; James E Herndon; Frances Laurie; Stephen L Seagren; T J Fitzgerald; Everett Vokes; Mark R Green
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 8.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Saion Chatterjee; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun M Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-02

9.  A pooled analysis of individual patient data from National Clinical Trials Network clinical trials of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer in elderly patients versus younger patients.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe; Wen Fan; Steven E Schild; Everett E Vokes; Jeff Bogart; Quynh-Thu Le; Charles R Thomas; Martin J Edelman; Leora Horn; Ritsuko Komaki; Harvey J Cohen; Apar Kishor Ganti; Herbert Pang; Xiaofei Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Patient education level as a predictor of survival in lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  James E Herndon; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.