Literature DB >> 15684777

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: an apparently safe and effective procedure.

James A Brown1, Christopher Garlitz, Stephen E Strup, Scott G Hubosky, Leonard Gomella.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in patients who have received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT), our initial series of 65 patients undergoing successful LRP was analyzed, specifically comparing 5 patients who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to 60 who did not.
METHODS: From March 2000 to March 2002, 68 patients were scheduled for LRP. Three cases, none post-NHT, were converted to open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Clinical and pathologic data were recorded on the remaining 65 patients, 5 of who had received NHT. Forty-two bilateral and 16 unilateral nerve sparing LRP were performed in the non-NHT cohort, and 3 bilateral and 1 unilateral nerve sparing LRP in the NHT cohort.
RESULTS: The mean patient age, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and biopsy grade were similar for the NHT and the non-NHT LRP cohorts. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) and serum hemoglobin decrease (preoperative to postoperative day 1) were lower in the NHT cohort than the non-NHT cohort: 160 mL and 2.4 g/dL vs. 317 mL and 3.1 g/dL, respectively. The mean operative time and hospital stay were similar: 5.7 hours and 2.4 days for the NHT cohort and 5.8 hours and 2.8 days for the non-NHT cohorts. As expected, the mean prostate weight was lower for the NHT cohort: 36.8 g vs. 46.5 g. All NHT cohort tumors were pathologic stage pT2, with negative margins. Eleven (18%) of the non-NHT cohort had pathologic T3 (10 patients) or T4 (1 patient) tumors and 10 (17%) specimens had a positive surgical margin. Four of 5 (80%) NHT cohort and 21 of 25 (84%) non-NHT cohort patients are continent (no pad use) 3 to 6 months postsurgery. One NHT cohort patient (20%) and 20 (33%) non-NHT cohort patients had an elevated drain fluid creatinine 24 hours postoperatively. There were no other complications in the NHT cohort. All 5 NHT cohort patients have no evidence of recurrent disease, whereas 2 non-NHT cohort patients (3.3%) have developed PSA recurrence. No NHT patient and only 1 non-NHT patient received a blood transfusion postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: LRP appears to be a safe and efficacious procedure in patients who have received NHT. Perioperative morbidity of NHT patients undergoing LRP appears equivalent to non-NHT patients, with slightly lower EBL, hemoglobin decrease, urinary extravasation, positive margin, and complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15684777     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Xing-Huan Wang; Yi-Long Wu; Huai-Peng Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Immediate robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation during robotic prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hung Jung; Francis Raymond P Arkoncel; Jae Won Lee; Noor Ashani Md Yusoff; Chang Hee Hong; Sung Joon Hong; Jae Mann Song; Sung-Jin Kim; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-28

4.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy preceding radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: early postoperative complications and biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Seung Woo Yang; Ki Hak Song; Jae Sung Lim; Chong Koo Sul
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-01-24

5.  Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

Authors:  Peiguo G Chu; Sean K Lau; Lawrence M Weiss; Mark Kawachi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Christopher Ruel; Rebecca Nelson; Laura Crocitto; Timothy Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Neoadjuvant hormone therapy following treatment with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy achieved favorable in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cheng-Pang Hou; Wei-Chang Lee; Yu-Hsiang Lin; Shao-Ming Chen; Chien-Lun Chen; Phei-Lang Chang; Horng-Heng Juang; Ke-Hung Tsui
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is a feasible option in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Taku Naiki; Noriyasu Kawai; Takehiko Okamura; Daisuke Nagata; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Hidetoshi Akita; Takahiro Yasui; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.