Literature DB >> 15684350

Tetrahydrogestrinone induces a genomic signature typical of a potent anabolic steroid.

Fernand Labrie1, Van Luu-The, Ezequiel Calvo, Céline Martel, Julie Cloutier, Sylvain Gauthier, Pascal Belleau, Jean Morissette, Marie-Hélène Lévesque, Claude Labrie.   

Abstract

Tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) is a recently identified compound having the greatest impact in the world of sports. In order to obtain a highly accurate and sensitive assessment of the potential anabolic/androgenic activity of THG, we have used microarrays to identify its effect on the expression of practically all the 30,000 genes in the mouse genome and compared it with the effect of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the most potent natural androgen. Quite remarkably, we found that 671 of the genes modulated by THG in the mouse muscle levator ani are modulated in a similar fashion by DHT, while in the gastrocnemius muscle and prostate, 95 and 939 genes respectively, are modulated in common by the two steroids. On the other hand, THG is more potent than DHT in binding to the androgen receptor, while, under in vivo conditions, THG possesses 20% of the potency of DHT in stimulating prostate, seminal vesicle and levator ani muscle weight in the mouse. The present microarray data provide an extremely precise and unquestionable signature of the androgenic/anabolic activity of THG, an approach which should apply to the analysis of the activity of any anabolic steroid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15684350     DOI: 10.1677/joe.1.05997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0022-0795            Impact factor:   4.286


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mad men, women and steroid cocktails: a review of the impact of sex and other factors on anabolic androgenic steroids effects on affective behaviors.

Authors:  Marie M Onakomaiya; Leslie P Henderson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Influence of nandrolone decanoate administration on serum lipids and liver enzymes in rats.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Samieinasab; Mohammad Reza Shahraki; Fatemah Samieinasab; Somayeh Najafi
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2015-07

3.  Comparison of crystal structures of human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed with various agonists reveals molecular determinants responsible for binding affinity.

Authors:  Karine Pereira de Jésus-Tran; Pierre-Luc Côté; Line Cantin; Jonathan Blanchet; Fernand Labrie; Rock Breton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Feasibility of a liver transcriptomics approach to assess bovine treatment with the prohormone dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA).

Authors:  Jeroen C W Rijk; Ad A C M Peijnenburg; Peter J M Hendriksen; Johan M Van Hende; Maria J Groot; Michel W F Nielen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Potential for sexual conflict assessed via testosterone-mediated transcriptional changes in liver and muscle of a songbird.

Authors:  Mark P Peterson; Kimberly A Rosvall; Charlene A Taylor; Jacqueline Ann Lopez; Jeong-Hyeon Choi; Charles Ziegenfus; Haixu Tang; John K Colbourne; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Pharmacology of anabolic steroids.

Authors:  A T Kicman
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  A concentration addition model for the activation of the constitutive androstane receptor by xenobiotic mixtures.

Authors:  William S Baldwin; Jonathan A Roling
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Expression and function of nuclear receptor co-activator 4: evidence of a potential role independent of co-activator activity.

Authors:  Alexandra Kollara; Theodore J Brown
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Inversion-based genomic signatures.

Authors:  Krister M Swenson; Bernard M E Moret
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.