PURPOSE: To describe the anesthetic management of a patient with extreme obesity undergoing bariatric surgery whose intraoperative narcotic management was entirely substituted with dexmedetomidine. CLINICAL FEATURES: We describe a 433-kg morbidly obese patient with obstructive sleep apnea and pulmonary hypertension who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Because of the concern that the use of narcotics might cause postoperative respiratory depression, we substituted their intraoperative use with a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.7 microg.kg(-1).hr(-1)). The anesthesia course was uneventful, and the intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine was associated with low anesthetic requirements (0.5 minimum alveolar concentration). After completion of the operation and after tracheal extubation, the dexmedetomidine infusion was continued uninterrupted throughout the end of the first postoperative day. The analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine extended narcotic-sparing effects into the postoperative period; the patient had lower narcotic requirements during the first postoperative day [48 mg of morphine by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)] while still receiving dexmedetomidine, compared to the second postoperative day (morphine 148 mg by PCA) with similar pain scores. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine may be a useful anesthetic adjunct for patients who are susceptible to narcotic-induced respiratory depression. In this morbidly obese patient the narcotic-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine were evident both intraoperatively and postoperatively.
PURPOSE: To describe the anesthetic management of a patient with extreme obesity undergoing bariatric surgery whose intraoperative narcotic management was entirely substituted with dexmedetomidine. CLINICAL FEATURES: We describe a 433-kg morbidly obesepatient with obstructive sleep apnea and pulmonary hypertension who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Because of the concern that the use of narcotics might cause postoperative respiratory depression, we substituted their intraoperative use with a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.7 microg.kg(-1).hr(-1)). The anesthesia course was uneventful, and the intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine was associated with low anesthetic requirements (0.5 minimum alveolar concentration). After completion of the operation and after tracheal extubation, the dexmedetomidine infusion was continued uninterrupted throughout the end of the first postoperative day. The analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine extended narcotic-sparing effects into the postoperative period; the patient had lower narcotic requirements during the first postoperative day [48 mg of morphine by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)] while still receiving dexmedetomidine, compared to the second postoperative day (morphine 148 mg by PCA) with similar pain scores. CONCLUSION:Dexmedetomidine may be a useful anesthetic adjunct for patients who are susceptible to narcotic-induced respiratory depression. In this morbidly obesepatient the narcotic-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine were evident both intraoperatively and postoperatively.
Authors: Philipp Fassbender; Frank Herbstreit; Matthias Eikermann; Helmut Teschler; Jürgen Peters Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Carine Zeeni; Marie T Aouad; Dayane Daou; Sara Naji; Samar Jabbour-Khoury; Ramzi S Alami; Bassem Y Safadi; Sahar M Siddik-Sayyid Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Sami Abu-Halaweh; Firas Obeidat; Anthony R Absalom; Abdelkareem AlOweidi; Mahmood Abu Abeeleh; Ibrahim Qudaisat; Fay Robinson; Keira P Mason Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 4.584