Literature DB >> 15684205

Association between screening for osteoporosis and the incidence of hip fracture.

Lisa M Kern1, Neil R Powe, Michael A Levine, Annette L Fitzpatrick, Tamara B Harris, John Robbins, Linda P Fried.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because direct evidence for the effectiveness of screening is lacking, guidelines disagree on whether people should be screened for osteoporosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether population-based screening for osteoporosis in older adults is associated with fewer incident hip fractures than usual medical care.
DESIGN: Nonconcurrent cohort study.
SETTING: Population-based cohort enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) from 4 states (California, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and North Carolina). PATIENTS: 3107 adults 65 years of age and older who attended their CHS study visits in 1994-1995. MEASUREMENTS: 31 participant characteristics (including demographic characteristics, medical histories, medications, and physical examination findings) and incident hip fractures over 6 years of follow-up. INTERVENTION: Bone density scans (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DEXA] at the hip) for participants in California and Pennsylvania (n = 1422) and usual care for participants in Maryland and North Carolina (n = 1685).
RESULTS: The incidence of hip fractures per 1000 person-years was 4.8 in the screened group and 8.2 in the usual care group. Screening was associated with a statistically significant lower hazard of hip fracture than usual care after adjustment for sex and propensity to be screened (Cox proportional hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.99]). LIMITATIONS: The mechanism of the association was unclear. A small unmeasured confounder that decreased the hazard of hip fracture could diminish or erase the observed association.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of hip DEXA scans to screen for osteoporosis in older adults was associated with 36% fewer incident hip fractures over 6 years compared with usual medical care. Further research is needed to explore the mechanism of this association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15684205     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-3-200502010-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  32 in total

Review 1.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Validation of the Cummings' risk score; how well does it identify women with high risk of hip fracture: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Luai A Ahmed; Henrik Schirmer; Vinjar Fønnebø; Ragnar M Joakimsen; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Osteoporotic fractures in Asia: risk factors and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Jian-min Liu; Guang Ning; Jia-lun Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Impact of clinical preventive services in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein; Gerald Ogola; Quay Mercer; Jaclyn Fong; Edward Devol; Carl E Couch; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2008-07

5.  Association of DPP-4 activity with BMD, body composition, and incident hip fracture: the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  L D Carbone; P Bůžková; H A Fink; J A Robbins; M Bethel; C M Isales; W D Hill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effect of bone mineral density and parathyroidectomy on fracture risk in primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Lindi H VanderWalde; In-Lu Amy Liu; Philip I Haigh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Population screening for osteoporosis risk: a randomised control trial of medication use and fracture risk.

Authors:  R J Barr; A Stewart; D J Torgerson; D M Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review.

Authors:  Juliana M Kling; Bart L Clarke; Nicole P Sandhu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Adherence of academic geriatric practitioners to osteoporosis screening guidelines.

Authors:  D N McNally; A M Kenny; J-A Smith
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.