R J Barr1, A Stewart, D J Torgerson, D M Reid. 1. Bone and Musculoskeletal Research Programme, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. r.j.barr@abdn.ac.uk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Randomised control trial of osteoporosis screening in 4,800 women aged 45-54 years was carried out. Screened group observed an increase of 7.9% in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use (p < 0.001), 15% in other osteoporosis treatments (p < 0.001) and a 25.9% reduction in fracture risk compared with control. Screening for osteoporosis significantly increases treatment use and reduces fracture incidence. INTRODUCTION: Population screening programmes can identify menopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) and elevated risk of future fracture but require to be proven effective by a randomised control trial. METHODS:A total of 4,800 women, 45-54 years, were randomised in equal numbers to screening or no screening (control) groups. Following screening, those in the lowest quartile of BMD were advised to consider HRT. Nine years later, the effect of screening on the uptake of treatment and the incidence of fractures were assessed by postal questionnaire. Categorical differences were assessed using chi(2) test. Cox regression was used to assess hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Of the screened and the control groups, 52.4% vs 44.5%, respectively, reported taking HRT (p < 0.001). In addition, 36.6% of the screened vs 21.6% of the control groups reported the use of vitamin D, calcium, alendronate, etidronate or raloxifene (p < 0.001). In a per protocol analysis of verified incident fractures, a 25.9% reduction in risk of fractures (of any site) in the screened group was observed (HR = 0.741, 95% CI = 0.551-0.998 adjusted age, weight and height). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for osteoporosis as assessed by low bone density significantly increases the use of HRT and other treatments for osteoporosis and reduces fracture incidence.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Randomised control trial of osteoporosis screening in 4,800 women aged 45-54 years was carried out. Screened group observed an increase of 7.9% in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use (p < 0.001), 15% in other osteoporosis treatments (p < 0.001) and a 25.9% reduction in fracture risk compared with control. Screening for osteoporosis significantly increases treatment use and reduces fracture incidence. INTRODUCTION: Population screening programmes can identify menopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) and elevated risk of future fracture but require to be proven effective by a randomised control trial. METHODS: A total of 4,800 women, 45-54 years, were randomised in equal numbers to screening or no screening (control) groups. Following screening, those in the lowest quartile of BMD were advised to consider HRT. Nine years later, the effect of screening on the uptake of treatment and the incidence of fractures were assessed by postal questionnaire. Categorical differences were assessed using chi(2) test. Cox regression was used to assess hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Of the screened and the control groups, 52.4% vs 44.5%, respectively, reported taking HRT (p < 0.001). In addition, 36.6% of the screened vs 21.6% of the control groups reported the use of vitamin D, calcium, alendronate, etidronate or raloxifene (p < 0.001). In a per protocol analysis of verified incident fractures, a 25.9% reduction in risk of fractures (of any site) in the screened group was observed (HR = 0.741, 95% CI = 0.551-0.998 adjusted age, weight and height). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for osteoporosis as assessed by low bone density significantly increases the use of HRT and other treatments for osteoporosis and reduces fracture incidence.
Authors: S T Harris; N B Watts; H K Genant; C D McKeever; T Hangartner; M Keller; C H Chesnut; J Brown; E F Eriksen; M S Hoseyni; D W Axelrod; P D Miller Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-10-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; W B Stason; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1987-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Michael A Clynes; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Br Med Bull Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 4.291
Authors: Kristie N Tu; Janette D Lie; Chew King Victoria Wan; Madison Cameron; Alaina G Austel; Jenny K Nguyen; Kevin Van; Diana Hyun Journal: P T Date: 2018-02
Authors: E Söreskog; F Borgström; L Shepstone; S Clarke; C Cooper; I Harvey; N C Harvey; A Howe; H Johansson; T Marshall; T W O'Neill; T J Peters; N M Redmond; D Turner; R Holland; E McCloskey; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Nicholas R Fuggle; Elizabeth M Curtis; Kate A Ward; Nicholas C Harvey; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Olivia L Tseng; John J Spinelli; Carolyn C Gotay; Wan Y Ho; Mary L McBride; Martin G Dawes Journal: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 5.346