Literature DB >> 15683516

Prospective study of axillary vein puncture with or without contrast venography for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation.

Haran Burri1, Henri Sunthorn, Pierre-André Dorsaz, Dipen Shah.   

Abstract

Axillary vein puncture may be used to implant pacemaker (PM) or cardioverter defibrillator leads, though usually requires venography. We prospectively compared punctures guided by venography versus a new radiological landmark. In 232 patients, the puncture was guided by injecting diluted contrast material via an ipsilateral peripheral vein (group A, n = 142), or without venography using the intersection of the lateral borders of the second and third rib as a radiological landmark, followed by contrast injection in case of failure (group B, n = 90). We implantated 1-3 leads per patient. In group A, implantation was successful in 135 patients (95%) and in group B in 55 patients (61%, P < 0.001 vs group A). Subsequent contrast injection allowed successful implantations in 34 of 35 patients, with an success rate of 97% for the overall study population of 224 patients. Venous access was achieved after a mean of 10.4 +/- 3.2 minutes of skin incision in group A versus 9.4 +/- 3.0 minutes in group B (ns). Pneumothorax occurred in two patients (1% overall). Thus non-contrast guided puncture using a new radiological landmark was successful in a majority of patients. This technique may be useful in absence of ipsilateral peripheral vein access, or presence of contrast allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15683516     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00039.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks: a safe and effective approach for implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Federico Migliore; Mariachiara Siciliano; Manuel De Lazzari; Sonia Ferretto; Chiara Dalla Valle; Alessandro Zorzi; Domenico Corrado; Sabino Iliceto; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Acute subclavian vein occlusion complicating biventricular ICD implantation.

Authors:  David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Complications in Device Therapy: Spectrum, Prevalence, and Management.

Authors:  J Llewellyn; D Garner; A Rao
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Successful management and long term outcome of an accidental subclavian artery injury with a 9 french dilator during pacemaker implantation with collagen-based closure device.

Authors:  Levente Molnár; Gábor Szucs; Endre Zima; Szabolcs Szilágyi; Valentina Kutyifa; Dávid Becker; László Gellér; Béla Merkely
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Optimized Axillary Vein Technique versus Subclavian Vein Technique in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Yi-Feng Zhou; Peng Yang; Yan-Sha Gao; Gui-Ru Zhao; Shi-Yan Ren; Xian-Lun Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  An unyielding valve leading to venous spasm during pacemaker implantation: a case report.

Authors:  Darshan Krishnappa; Scott Sakaguchi; Ganesh Kasinadhuni; Venkatakrishna N Tholakanahalli
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.