Literature DB >> 15682490

Analysis of prognosis on patients with severe viral hepatitis using the model for end-stage liver disease.

Zhi-Hong Weng1, Shu-Qing Cai.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the practical use of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) on clinic and assess its validity by the concordance (C)-statistic in predicting the prognosis of the patient with severe viral hepatitis.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients were divided into plasma exchange group and non-plasma exchange group, and were graded with MELD formula. The death rate was observed within 3 mo.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients died within 3 mo (35 cases in PE group, 46 cases in non-PE group). The mortality of patients in PE group whose MELD score between 20-30 and 30-40 were 31.6% and 57.7%, respectively, but in non-PE cases they were 67.6%, 81.3% respectively. There was significant difference between PE group and non-PE group (P<0.05). However, the mortality of patients whose MELD score higher than 40 were 93.3% in PE group and 100% in non-PE group and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.65>0.05). The optimal cut-off values of MELD to predict the prognosis of patients were 30 in PE group whose sensitivity, specificity and C-statistic were 80.0%, 52.0% and 0.777, but in non-PE group they were 25, 82.6%, 86.7% and 0.869, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The MELD score can act as a disease severity index for patients with severe viral hepatitis, and the mortality of the patient increases with the increase of the MELD score. The MELD can accurately predict the short-term prognosis of patients with severe viral hepatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15682490      PMCID: PMC4250606          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i6.899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  7 in total

1.  Predicting the prognosis of chronic liver disease: an evolution from child to MELD. Mayo End-stage Liver Disease.

Authors:  L M Forman; M R Lucey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology.

Authors:  A R van Erkel; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study.

Authors:  F Botta; E Giannini; P Romagnoli; A Fasoli; F Malfatti; B Chiarbonello; E Testa; D Risso; G Colla; R Testa
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The outcome of the first 165 orthotopic liver transplants in Scotland.

Authors:  A J Bathgate; O J Garden; J R Forsythe; K K Madhaven; N D Finlayson; K J Simpson; P C Hayes; A J MacGilchrist
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 0.729

Review 5.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Predictors of the outcomes of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure.

Authors:  Hsiu-Lung Fan; Po-Sheng Yang; Hui-Wei Chen; Teng-Wei Chen; De-Chuan Chan; Chi-Hong Chu; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Shih-Ming Kuo; Chung-Bao Hsieh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.