Literature DB >> 15679686

Hospital doctors and their schemas about appropriate prescribing.

Mark P Higgins1, Mary P Tully.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate cognitive schemas and schema systems used by hospital doctors to influence prescribing, particularly in terms of making appropriate prescribing decisions, and to compare the numbers and content of schemas between doctors with different levels of experience.
DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with a purposively selected sample. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Seven pre-registration (PRHOs) and 5 senior house officers (SHOs) and 5 consultants from a range of medical specialties in a teaching hospital.
RESULTS: The qualitative analysis of the themes and patterns explored during the interviews indicated that all doctors articulated schemas that influenced their behaviour. The junior doctors seemed to have simplistic schemas, with interdoctor agreement; the consultants appeared to have more sophisticated schemas, with greater individual variation. Those schemas adopted by the PRHOs (prescribing "novices") could be subsumed by, rather than contradicted by, those of the consultants (prescribing "experts"), with a transitional stage demonstrated by the SHOs. The most noticeable distinction was the greater emphasis by consultants on holistic patient care and what might be seen as their separate schemas for appropriate prescribing stemmed from that premise. In contrast, junior doctors appeared to have had a single schema that encompassed both prescribing generally and appropriate prescribing.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the design of this study was cross-sectional rather than longitudinal, the findings suggest that the acquisition and adjustment of schemas and schema systems are significant factors in the professional development of the hospital doctor from novice through to expert. It could be hypothesised that house officers possess simpler schemas as a way of coping with their job demands, which evolve in complexity as they gain experience. However, the transitional stage found with the SHOs is critical during cognitive development, with implications for the training and support available to doctors throughout their professional careers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15679686     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02056.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

Review 1.  Which non-technical skills do junior doctors require to prescribe safely? A systematic review.

Authors:  Effie Dearden; Edward Mellanby; Helen Cameron; Jeni Harden
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  The role of computerized decision support in reducing errors in selecting medicines for prescription: narrative review.

Authors:  Melissa T Baysari; Johanna Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Richard O Day
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Supporting patients with unlicensed medicine use: Analysing the script schemas for prescribing, pharmaceutical assessment and supply.

Authors:  Gemma Donovan; Lindsay Parkin; Lyn Brierley-Jones; Scott Wilkes
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Accuracy of prescribing documentation by UK junior doctors undertaking psychiatry placements: a multi-centre observational study.

Authors:  Mrinalini Dey; Kurt Buhagiar; Farid Jabbar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2019-09-04

5.  Categorizing patients in a forced-choice triad task: the integration of context in patient management.

Authors:  Sarah L Devantier; John Paul Minda; Mark Goldszmidt; Wael Haddara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.