Literature DB >> 15678042

Intermediate results of isolated mitral valve replacement with a Biocor porcine valve.

Giulio Rizzoli1, Tomaso Bottio, Vladimiro Vida, Georgios Nesseris, Luca Caprili, Gaetano Thiene, Gino Gerosa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the intermediate experience, survival, and prosthetic complications of patients who received the Biocor valve, a new-generation porcine valve, in the mitral position.
METHODS: At the University of Padua, between May 1992 and January 2004, 154 consecutive patients (102 female and 52 male patients; mean age, 72.3 +/- 6 years; age range, 37-86 years) received 158 mitral Biocor prostheses (Biocor Industria e Pesguisa Ltda, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Thirty-five percent of the patients had previous mitral operations, 24% had coronary artery bypass grafting, and 34.6% had other procedures. Median preoperative New York Heart Association class was III. Echocardiography was performed in 75% of the long-term survivors. Follow-up included 609.4 patient-years and was 100% complete, with a median time of 4 patient-years (range, 0.02-11.3 years). At 8 years, 20 (14%) of 142 operative survivors were still at risk.
RESULTS: Early mortality was 13.6%. According to univariate analysis, New York Heart Association class III to IV, ejection fraction of less than 40%, urgency, male sex, and coronary artery bypass grafting were significant perioperative risk factors. Eight- and 10-year actuarial survival was 51.1% +/- 5.6% (40 deaths). Eight-year actuarial freedom from valve-related death, thromboembolism, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, endocarditis, paravalvular leak, and valve-related complications were 85.2% +/- 5%, 85.7% +/- 4.4%, 92.6% +/- 3.7%, 94.1% +/- 3%, 91.8% +/- 3%, and 70.2% +/- 5.7%, respectively. Freedom from structural valve deterioration was 100%. Actual freedom from reoperation was 93.2% +/- 2.2%. By Doppler echocardiography, the peak and mean transprosthetic gradients were 15 +/- 5 mm Hg and 6.3 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively (mean follow-up, 4.2 +/- 2.7 years).
CONCLUSION: At intermediate follow-up, the Biocor prosthesis in the mitral position showed excellent results in terms of valve durability when compared with other second-generation tissue valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15678042     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

Authors:  David H Adams; Anelechi C Anyanwu; Parwis B Rahmanian; Farzan Filsoufi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Factors affecting survival after mitral valve replacement in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  Abdulhameed Aziz; Jennifer S Lawton; Hersh S Maniar; Michael K Pasque; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Mitral Valve Replacement-Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Johan van der Merwe; Filip Casselman
Journal:  Open J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-13

4.  Atrial and ventricular flows across a transcatheter mitral valve.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Gunnar Askegaard; Ramji Iyer; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-28

5.  The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna mitral valve bioprosthesis: intermediate-term efficacy and durability.

Authors:  Gabriel Loor; Andres Schuster; Vincent Cruz; Aldo Rafael; William J Stewart; James Diaz; Kenneth McCurry
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.