Literature DB >> 15677350

Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise.

Yaoda Xu1.   

Abstract

It has previously been reported (Gauthier et al., 2000, Nat. Neurosci., 3:191-197) in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study that objects of visual expertise (cars and birds) activate the right fusiform face area (FFA) more strongly than non-expertise stimuli, and it was argued that the right FFA is involved in expertise specific rather than face specific visual processing. This expertise effect, however, may be due to experts taking advantage of the 'faceness' of the stimuli: birds have faces and three-quarter frontal views of cars resemble faces. This expertise effect may also be caused by a biased attentional modulation: with a blocked fMRI design, experts may attend more to a block of expertise than a block of non-expertise stimuli. In this study, using both side-view car images that do not resemble faces and bird images in an event-related fMRI design that minimizes attentional modulation, an expertise effect in the right FFA is observed in both car and bird experts (although a baseline bias makes the bird expertise effect less reliable). These results are consistent with those of Gauthier et al., and suggest the involvement of the right FFA in processing non-face expertise visual stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677350     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  50 in total

1.  Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience.

Authors:  Guomei Zhou; Zhijie Cheng; Xudong Zhang; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Visual prediction and perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Fusing multiple neuroimaging modalities to assess group differences in perception-action coupling.

Authors:  Jordan Muraskin; Jason Sherwin; Gregory Lieberman; Javier O Garcia; Timothy Verstynen; Jean M Vettel; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 10.961

6.  The Quest for the FFA and Where It Led.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The role of face familiarity in eye tracking of faces by individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Lindsey Sterling; Geraldine Dawson; Sara Webb; Michael Murias; Jeffrey Munson; Heracles Panagiotides; Elizabeth Aylward
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-02-28

Review 8.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Process and domain specificity in regions engaged for face processing: an fMRI study of perceptual differentiation.

Authors:  Heather R Collins; Xun Zhu; Ramesh S Bhatt; Jonathan D Clark; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.