Literature DB >> 15677008

Critical power as an endurance index.

J F Vautier1, H Vandewalle, H Arabi, H Monod.   

Abstract

The relationship between exhaustion time (t(lim)) and the work performed at the end of constant-power exercises can be described by a linear relationship (Wlim = a + b t(lim)) for work involving the whole body (eg cycling) or part of the body (eg knee extensions). The slope b in the equation is termed the critical power and has been proposed as an index of the capacity to perform work over a long period of time. The first objective of the present study was to compare the values of slopes b calculated from whole-body work of short duration, ie maximal and supra-maximal cycling exercises (slope b1), with the values calculated from the same work, the durations of which were between 3.5 and 35 min (slope b3), as in the protocols used by Scherrer and Monod (1960) for body-part work. Slope b1 was significantly higher than slope b3 in 10 subjects who performed 5 cycling exhausting exercises (60, 73, 86, 100 and 120% of maximal aerobic power (MAP) in watts). Exhaustion times corresponding to power outputs equivalent to b1 and b3 were equal to 29.0 +/- 19.1 min and 48.6 +/- 9.8 min respectively. Moreover, the exhaustion times at 60 and 73%,MAP were significantly correlated with slope b3 (expressed in %MAP) but not with slope b1. Consequently, slope b3 should be considered as the critical power instead of slope b1 as in some studies in the literature (Moritani et al, 1981). The second objective was to study the physiological significance of the critical power (slope b3) of whole-body work (cycling). The workload that corresponded to a lactate steady state was not significantly different from b3 (68.8 +/- 6.0 vs 68.7 +/- 6.3% MAP). Nevertheless, slope b3 represents a workload corresponding to a slight but significant drift of heart rate or oxygen uptake. These results probably explain why b3 is a power which can be maintained for a long time but not beyond about l h in an average subject.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 15677008     DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00009-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Methods to determine aerobic endurance.

Authors:  Laurent Bosquet; Luc Léger; Patrick Legros
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  A single-session testing protocol to determine critical power and W'.

Authors:  Keren Constantini; Surendran Sabapathy; Troy J Cross
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Asymmetrical pedaling patterns in Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Amanda L Penko; Joshua R Hirsch; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Philip E Martin; Gordon Blackburn; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Flawed analysis and erroneous interpretations of the critical power concept: response to Mr. Dotan.

Authors:  Mark Burnley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  A critical review of critical power.

Authors:  Raffy Dotan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  The relationship between movement speed and duration during soccer matches.

Authors:  Kai Roecker; Hubert Mahler; Christian Heyde; Mareike Röll; Albert Gollhofer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Modelling of Running Performances: Comparisons of Power-Law, Hyperbolic, Logarithmic, and Exponential Models in Elite Endurance Runners.

Authors:  H Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.