Literature DB >> 15676311

Gender differences in performance of a selection test using the incremental lifting machine.

J M Stevenson1, D R Greenhorn, J T Bryant, J M Deakin, J T Smith.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was twofold: (1) to examine any gender differences in the performance of a pre-employment selection test using the incremental lifting machine (ILM); and (2) to formulate recommendations regarding analyses of selection fairness in studies of pre-employment screening tests and devices. Data were collected in a series of studies designed to permit analyses of: (1) dynamic measures derived for a 1.8 m maximum ILM strength test; (2) relationships between ILM test scores and performance of a maximal box-lifting task using three different protocols; (3) the impact of anthropom trie measures on performance of both test and task; (4) prediction of actual task performance; and (5) accuracy of the ILM screening test for three different cut-off standards. Results revealed that females differed significantly from males in their performance of a 1.8 m maximum ILM strength test in terms of timing, displacement, velocity, acceleration, force and power. Maximum ILM scores attained by females were poorly correlated with maximum box-lifting scores, but they were significantly related to body weight. Also, regression analyses based on ILM scores and associated dynamic parameters accounted for twice as much variance in box-lifting scores for males than for females. Furthermore, the use of cut-off standards of 22.7 kg and 27.3 kg produced a percentage of false negative results for females (12% and 32% respectively), but not for males. Also, for the cut-off level of 27.3 kg, female selection rates were only 56% of the selection rates for males. Issues for future investigation are recommended.

Year:  1996        PMID: 15676311     DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00053-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Sex differences in injury patterns among workers in heavy manufacturing.

Authors:  Oyebode A Taiwo; Linda F Cantley; Martin D Slade; Keshia M Pollack; Sally Vegso; Martha G Fiellin; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Gender and sex differences in job status and hypertension.

Authors:  Jane E Clougherty; Ellen A Eisen; Martin D Slade; Ichiro Kawachi; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health.

Authors:  Jane E Clougherty; Kerry Souza; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Women and occupational lung disease: sex differences and gender influences on research and disease outcomes.

Authors:  Patricia G Camp; Helen Dimich-Ward; Susan M Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.878

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.