Literature DB >> 15671005

Sensitivity encoding for diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study.

Christiane K Kuhl1, Jürgen Gieseke, Marcus von Falkenhausen, Jochen Textor, Sunhild Gernert, Christiane Sonntag, Hans H Schild.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate whether diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) at 3.0 T can help to improve image quality and confidence in and accuracy of diagnosis of ischemic lesions, compared with DW MR imaging with conventional phase encoding, in patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients provided informed consent after the study had been explained, and the institutional review board approved the study protocol. Eighty-five patients (46 male and 39 female patients; age range, 13-86 years; mean age, 52 years) underwent single-shot spin-echo echo-planar DW MR imaging at 3.0 T twice, in a randomized order: once with conventional phase encoding (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 4283/79) and once with SENSE (3141/69, with a reduction factor of three). With both, 128 x 128 matrix, 24 4-mm-thick sections, and two b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) were used. An eight-element SENSE-compatible receive-only surface coil was used; the built-in body coil served for radiofrequency transmission and generation of the coil sensitivity profile. SENSE and conventional phase encoding were compared for image quality, signal-to-noise ratio, relative signal intensity (SI), and lesion contrast. Two neuroradiologists read images. Diagnostic accuracy of and confidence in detection of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) lesions with conventional phase encoding and SENSE at MR imaging were compared; matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test statistical significance.
RESULTS: No major SENSE-related artifacts were seen. At MR imaging with SENSE, consistently and significantly (P < .001) higher image quality scores were achieved because of substantial reduction of image distortions and blurring. Lesion contrast was equivalent with both techniques. Diagnostic confidence for demonstration and exclusion of lesions was significantly (P < .001) higher at MR imaging with SENSE. In three patients, small microembolic lesions were only prospectively diagnosed at MR imaging with SENSE, whereas they were masked by adjacent susceptibility effects and therefore overlooked at MR imaging with conventional phase encoding.
CONCLUSION: Parallel MR imaging with SENSE is feasible at 3.0 T. It significantly improves image quality, particularly by reducing or even preventing susceptibility-induced SI changes and image blurring. There was a significantly improved diagnostic confidence with which ADC changes were identified or excluded. (c) RSNA, 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15671005     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342031626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  Clinical assessment of standard and generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition diffusion imaging: effects of reduction factor and spatial resolution.

Authors:  J B Andre; G Zaharchuk; N J Fischbein; M Augustin; S Skare; M Straka; J Rosenberg; M G Lansberg; S Kemp; C A C Wijman; G W Albers; N E Schwartz; R Bammer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques: Lessons for Clinicians.

Authors:  Vijay P B Grover; Joshua M Tognarelli; Mary M E Crossey; I Jane Cox; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mark J W McPhail
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-20

3.  Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Y A Bhagat; D J Emery; S Naik; T Yeo; C Beaulieu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  MRI evaluation of the knee with non-ferromagnetic external fixators: cadaveric knee model.

Authors:  Peter Elsissy; Yusuf T Akpolat; Alexander Chien; Wayne K Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-06-09

5.  Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography in infants with cholestasis.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Myung-Joon Kim; Choon-Sik Yoon; Yong Eun Chung; Seok Joo Han; Hong Koh
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03

6.  Image artifacts on prostate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: trade-offs at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; H Alberto Vargas; Gregory Nyman; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Usefulness of high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in acute cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Keiko Toyoda; Satomi Kitai; Masahiro Ida; Sadao Suga; Yutaka Aoyagi; Kunihiko Fukuda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Noam Nissan; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  High field MRI in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: high field-high yield?

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer.

Authors:  Aoi Matsuoka; Masako Minato; Masafumi Harada; Hitoshi Kubo; Yoshikatsu Bandou; Akira Tangoku; Kiichirou Nakano; Hiromu Nishitani
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.