Literature DB >> 15670864

A comparison of nutrient regulation between solitarious and gregarious phases of the specialist caterpillar, Spodoptera exempta (Walker).

Kwang Pum Lee1, Stephen J Simpson, David Raubenheimer.   

Abstract

Nutritional regulatory responses were compared between solitarious and gregarious phases of the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta. When allowed to mix between two nutritionally imbalanced but complementary foods, final-instar caterpillars in both phases selected a diet comprising more carbohydrate than protein. This contrasts with other larval lepidopterans studied to date. Only minor differences were found in the position of the intake target for the two phases, despite their different energetic requirements for migration as adults. When restricted to nutritionally imbalanced diets, caterpillars of both phases were less disposed to overeat protein on high-protein diets than carbohydrate on high-carbohydrate diets, relative to the self-composed intake target. However, in both cases gregarious larvae overingested the excess nutrient to a greater degree than did solitarious larvae. Furthermore, gregarious larvae showed higher nitrogen conversion efficiency on an extreme protein-limiting diet, and accumulated more lipid per amount of carbohydrate consumed on carbohydrate-deficient diets. These phase-associated nutritional differences are consistent with the life-history strategies of the two phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15670864     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  8 in total

1.  Prey nutrient composition has different effects on Pardosa wolf spiders with dissimilar life histories.

Authors:  Kim Jensen; David Mayntz; Søren Toft; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Match and mismatch: conservation physiology, nutritional ecology and the timescales of biological adaptation.

Authors:  David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson; Alice H Tait
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Regulation of nutrient intake in nectar-feeding birds: insights from the geometric framework.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; David Raubenheimer; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Two's a crowd: phenotypic adjustments and prophylaxis in Anticarsia gemmatalis larvae are triggered by the presence of conspecifics.

Authors:  Farley W S Silva; Daniel L Viol; Sirlene V Faria; Eraldo Lima; Fernando H Valicente; Simon L Elliot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Variation in cyanogenic compounds concentration within a Heliconius butterfly community: does mimicry explain everything?

Authors:  Mónica Arias; Aimilia Meichanetzoglou; Marianne Elias; Neil Rosser; Donna Lisa de-Silva; Bastien Nay; Violaine Llaurens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Bidirectional interactions between beet armyworm and its host in response to different fertilization conditions.

Authors:  Sifang Wang; Tianbo Ding; Manlin Xu; Bin Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dietary mechanism behind the costs associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni.

Authors:  Ikkei Shikano; Jenny S Cory
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dynamics of macronutrient self-medication and illness-induced anorexia in virally infected insects.

Authors:  Sonia Povey; Sheena C Cotter; Stephen J Simpson; Kenneth Wilson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.091

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.