Literature DB >> 15670413

Predictability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy and translocations on prospective attempts.

S Munné1, T Escudero, P Colls, Z Xuezhong, M Oter, M Garrisi, F Barnes, C Zouves, L Werlin, C Magli, J Cohen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if the outcomes of aneuploidy and translocation testing by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) at the 8-cell stage have a predictive value for new genetic diagnosis cycles. In total, 83 cycles (39 patients) undergoing PGD of translocations and 378 cycles (176 patients) of aneuploidy were included. Predictability, defined as having similar rate (+/-20%) of euploid embryos in the first and successive cycles, was found in 66% of patients undergoing aneuploidy testing. Predictability was found significantly more often in patients undergoing PGD of translocations (90%, P = 0.006). In addition, patients with 0, <30 or > or =30% euploid embryos in the first cycle were compared and groups 0 and <30% had significantly fewer euploid embryos in the second cycle (22-26%) than those of the group with > or =30% (37%) (P < 0.05). Patients who did not become pregnant after the first attempt were stimulated more aggressively than those becoming pregnant, producing significantly more embryos in the second than in the first cycle (P < 0.001). Therefore, correlation between euploidy rate and pregnancy rate could not be assessed objectively between cycles. In conclusion, the PGD results of a first cycle can predict the results of the second cycle, but this is likely to be of more value when the condition investigated is translocation rather than aneuploidy. The chance of pregnancy is usually related to the number of euploid embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15670413     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61775-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  6 in total

1.  The utility of embryo banking in order to increase the number of embryos available for preimplantation genetic screening in advanced maternal age patients.

Authors:  John J Orris; Tyl H Taylor; Janice W Gilchrist; Susan V Hallowell; Michael J Glassner; J David Wininger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Down syndrome pregnancy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Chen-ming Xu; Yi-min Zhu; Min-yue Dong; Yu-li Qian; Fan Jin; He-feng Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Preconceptional diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation as an alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in two situations: a pilot study.

Authors:  D Molina Gomes; I Hammoud; M Bailly; M Bergere; R Wainer; J Selva; F Vialard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an update on current technologies and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Kou Sueoka
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-14

Review 6.  Trisomy 21 and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A review.

Authors:  Edgard Sánchez-Pavón; Hector Mendoza; Javier García-Ferreyra
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-01-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.