AIM: To determine the visual outcome and corticosteroid dose requirement in patients with non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment treated with corticosteroids and additional second-line immunosuppression. METHOD: A retrospective, non-comparative case series was carried out. Seventy-two patients (141 eyes) with uncontrolled non-infectious uveitis on systemic prednisolone were treated with at least one second-line immunosuppressive agent in addition to systemic prednisolone and followed for at least 3 months. Visual acuity (VA), clinical disease activity, corticosteroid-sparing effect, disease relapses requiring corticosteroid dose increase,and side-effects from second-line agents were evaluated. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period (mean: 55.5 months),70 eyes (49.6%) had VA of 6/9 or better. There was a reduction in the mean maintenance dose of prednisolone required before the introduction of the second-line agent (19 mg/day +/- 2 SE)when compared to the mean maintenance dose of prednisolone at the end of the data collection (9 mg/day +/- 1 SE; P <0.001). There was also a significant reduction in the number of disease relapses requiring an increase in prednisolone dose after starting the second-line agents as compared to the year before (P <0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with uveitis affecting the posterior segment, the addition of all second-line immunosuppressive therapy was effective in allowing reduction of the dose of systemic prednisolone to 10 mg/day or less, in controlling intraocular inflammation, reducing the number of relapses and in maintaining vision. Because of their side-effects, immunosuppressive treatment should be individualized and monitored closely but its addition is beneficial in the short and longer term.
AIM: To determine the visual outcome and corticosteroid dose requirement in patients with non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment treated with corticosteroids and additional second-line immunosuppression. METHOD: A retrospective, non-comparative case series was carried out. Seventy-two patients (141 eyes) with uncontrolled non-infectious uveitis on systemic prednisolone were treated with at least one second-line immunosuppressive agent in addition to systemic prednisolone and followed for at least 3 months. Visual acuity (VA), clinical disease activity, corticosteroid-sparing effect, disease relapses requiring corticosteroid dose increase,and side-effects from second-line agents were evaluated. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period (mean: 55.5 months),70 eyes (49.6%) had VA of 6/9 or better. There was a reduction in the mean maintenance dose of prednisolone required before the introduction of the second-line agent (19 mg/day +/- 2 SE)when compared to the mean maintenance dose of prednisolone at the end of the data collection (9 mg/day +/- 1 SE; P <0.001). There was also a significant reduction in the number of disease relapses requiring an increase in prednisolone dose after starting the second-line agents as compared to the year before (P <0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with uveitis affecting the posterior segment, the addition of all second-line immunosuppressive therapy was effective in allowing reduction of the dose of systemic prednisolone to 10 mg/day or less, in controlling intraocular inflammation, reducing the number of relapses and in maintaining vision. Because of their side-effects, immunosuppressive treatment should be individualized and monitored closely but its addition is beneficial in the short and longer term.
Authors: G J Williams; S Brannan; J V Forrester; M P Gavin; S P Paterson-Brown; A T Purdie; M Virdi; J A Olson Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Aimee O Hersh; Spencer Cope; John F Bohnsack; Akbar Shakoor; Albert T Vitale Journal: Ocul Immunol Inflamm Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 3.070
Authors: Ana Belen Rivas; Amanda Lopez-Picado; Valentina Calamia; Ester Carreño; Lidia Cocho; Miguel Cordero-Coma; Alex Fonollosa; Felix M Francisco Hernandez; Angel Garcia-Aparicio; Javier Garcia-Gonzalez; Jose Juan Mondejar; Leticia Lojo-Oliveira; Llucí Martínez-Costa; Santiago Munoz; Diana Peiteado; Jose Antonio Pinto; Beatriz Rodriguez-Lozano; Esperanza Pato; David Diaz-Valle; Elena Molina; Luis Alberto Tebar; Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mohammad O Tallouzi; David J Moore; Melanie Calvert; Philip I Murray; Nicholas Bucknall; Alastair K Denniston Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-13