Literature DB >> 15668499

Molecular epidemiology of physical activity and cancer.

Andrew Rundle1.   

Abstract

As in other areas of epidemiology, researchers studying physical activity and cancer have begun to include laboratory analyses of biological specimens in their studies. The incorporation of these "biomarkers" into epidemiology has been termed molecular epidemiology and is an approach primarily developed to study chemical carcinogens. Thus far, there has been no discussion in the field on how the established molecular epidemiologic framework might be adapted for research into physical activity, what methodologic needs exist, what the goals of such an approach might be, and what limitations exist. This article relates the literature on molecular epidemiology to the needs of physical activity research and tries to set research priorities for the field as it moves in this new direction. Although this approach will be very useful for investigating the mechanisms through which physical activity exerts effects, there are several challenges for physical activity epidemiologists in adapting molecular epidemiologic approaches. Primarily, there are currently no available biomarkers that might be considered measures of exposure or biologically effective dose. In addition, most available biomarkers of intermediate effects have been tested in training studies at activity levels much higher than those seen in population-based epidemiologic studies. Thus, it is not clear whether these biomarkers are valid at lower activity levels. Furthermore, the nature of the relationship between activity and many available biomarkers depends very much on the context of the activity. Addressing these issues should be a priority if we are to develop a molecular epidemiologic paradigm for studying physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  19 in total

Review 1.  Potential for prostate cancer prevention through physical activity.

Authors:  Stacey Young-McCaughan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Lack of association between physical activity in smokers and plasma glutathione peroxidase levels.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Catherine Richards; Deliang Tang; Frederica Perera
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Wheel running, skeletal muscle aerobic capacity and 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea induced mammary carcinogenesis in the rat.

Authors:  Phillip B Mann; Weiqin Jiang; Zongjian Zhu; Pamela Wolfe; Anne McTiernan; Henry J Thompson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Physical activity and prostate gene expression in men with low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Jesus M Magbanua; Erin L Richman; Eduardo V Sosa; Lee W Jones; Jeff Simko; Katsuto Shinohara; Christopher M Haqq; Peter R Carroll; June M Chan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Polymorphisms in oxidative stress genes, physical activity, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Lauren E McCullough; Regina M Santella; Rebecca J Cleveland; Patrick T Bradshaw; Robert C Millikan; Kari E North; Andrew F Olshan; Sybil M Eng; Christine B Ambrosone; Jiyoung Ahn; Susan E Steck; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on lung cancer mortality.

Authors:  Xuemei Sui; Duck-Chul Lee; Charles E Matthews; Swann A Adams; James R Hébert; Timothy S Church; Chong-Do Lee; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Physical activity and lung cancer among non-smokers: a pilot molecular epidemiological study within EPIC.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; John Richie; Karen Steindorf; Marco Peluso; Kim Overvad; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; Jacob P Linseisen; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Hendrik B Bueno-De-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Eiliv Lund; Carlos A Gonzalez; Carmen Martinez; Miren Dorronsoro; Aurelio Barricarte; M Jose Tormo; Josèr Quiros; Antonio Agudo; Goran Berglund; Bengt Jarvholm; Sheila Bingham; Timothy J Key; Emmanuelle Gormally; Rodolfo Saracci; Rudolf Kaaks; Elio Riboli; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Combination of physical activity, nutrition, or other metabolic factors and vaccine response.

Authors:  Kenneth W Hance; Connie J Rogers; Stephen D Hursting; John W Greiner
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2007-09-01

9.  Physical activity, white blood cell count, and lung cancer risk in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks; Kristine E Lee; John M Hampton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  A prospective study of physical activity and breast cancer incidence in African-American women.

Authors:  Lynn Rosenberg; Julie R Palmer; Traci N Bethea; Yulun Ban; Kristen Kipping-Ruane; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.