Literature DB >> 1566785

Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure.

K G Keijser1, P Kenemans, P H van der Zanden, C P Schijf, G P Vooijs, R Rolland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diathermy loop excision was performed as a new diagnostic-treatment in patients with cervical cytologic diagnoses consistent with an epithelial abnormality. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 424 patients with cervical cytologic diagnoses consistent with an epithelial abnormality, but macroscopically or colposcopically not consistent with invasive carcinoma, were subjected to diathermy loop excision to diagnose and treat cervical lesions in one procedure.
RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy rate was 99%. In patients with histologically confirmed grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, pretreatment cytologic diagnosis and subsequent histopathologic diagnosis corresponded in 73% of cases. In 91% of all patients the diathermy loop excision was sufficient for complete treatment. Cervical morphologic findings after treatment allowed adequate cytologic follow-up. There was no evidence that diathermy loop excision influenced fertility or pregnancy outcome.
CONCLUSION: Diathermy loop excision is a reliable, well-tolerated, inexpensive, and efficient technique for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This outpatient procedure is especially recommended in younger patients, because diathermy loop excision preserves the function of the cervix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1566785     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90622-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Three-step approach versus see-and-treat approach in patients with cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Nilgun Guducu; Guliz Sidar; Nuray Bassullu; Ilknur Turkmen; Ilkkan Dunder
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-05-22

2.  Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy.

Authors:  A M Zaitoun; G McKee; M J Coppen; S M Thomas; P O Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Prospective Comparison of Loop Excision under Colposcopic Guidance versus Vitom Guidance.

Authors:  G F Vercellino; V Chiantera; J Gaßmann; E Erdemoglu; I Drechsler; S Frangini; A Schneider; G Böhmer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Cervical surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and prolonged time to conception of a live birth: a case-control study.

Authors:  C N Spracklen; K K Harland; B J Stegmann; A F Saftlas
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  The accuracy of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure under colposcopic vision.

Authors:  Komsun Suwannarurk; Sutatip Bhamarapravati; Yuthadej Thaweekul; Karicha Mairaing; Yenrudee Poomtavorn; Junya Pattaraarchachai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Mechanical dilatation of the stenosed cervix under local anesthesia: A prospective case series.

Authors:  Kirsty V Biggs; San Soo Hoo; Mallikarjun Kodampur
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 1.697

Review 7.  Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Anita Mitra; Marc Arbyn; Maria Paraskevaidi; Antonios Athanasiou; Pierre P L Martin-Hirsch; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-29

8.  Value of second pass in loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.

Authors:  Kidong Kim; Soon-Beom Kang; Hyun Hoon Chung; Tack-Sang Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.