OBJECTIVES: To describe the effect of cholinesterase inhibitors (CEIs) on the natural course of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using clinically meaningful outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study. SETTING: Referral dementia clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-five matched pairs of patients with probable AD. MEASUREMENTS: The risk of AD patients being classified as slow progressors (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score change <or=2 at 1-year follow-up) was examined as a function of treatment with CEIs. A logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, sex, education level, MMSE score, Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (BDRS) for activities of daily living (ADLs), extrapyramidal signs, psychosis, major depression, and use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and sedative/hypnotics determined the factors that best predict slow progression and nursing home admission. RESULTS: Eighty-one (60%) of the patients on CEIs and 53 (39%) of the patients who never used CEIs were considered slow progressors (P=.001) at 1-year follow-up. Slow progression was associated only with CEI use (relative risk (RR)=2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.45-4.16), and sedative/hypnotics use was associated with a MMSE change of 3 points or more (RR=0.35, 95% CI=0.13-0.93). CEI use had a protective effect on nursing home admission (RR=0.095, 95% CI=0.03-0.30), whereas higher scores on the BDRS for ADLs increased risk of admission at 24- and 36-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: CEI use had a clinically meaningful effect on the natural history of AD. Patients taking CEIs were 2.5 times more likely to progress slowly and had a lower risk of nursing home admission after 2 years, even after controlling for multiple factors that can alter the course of the disease, and a slower rate of decline during the first year of follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the effect of cholinesterase inhibitors (CEIs) on the natural course of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using clinically meaningful outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study. SETTING: Referral dementia clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-five matched pairs of patients with probable AD. MEASUREMENTS: The risk of ADpatients being classified as slow progressors (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score change <or=2 at 1-year follow-up) was examined as a function of treatment with CEIs. A logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, sex, education level, MMSE score, Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (BDRS) for activities of daily living (ADLs), extrapyramidal signs, psychosis, major depression, and use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and sedative/hypnotics determined the factors that best predict slow progression and nursing home admission. RESULTS: Eighty-one (60%) of the patients on CEIs and 53 (39%) of the patients who never used CEIs were considered slow progressors (P=.001) at 1-year follow-up. Slow progression was associated only with CEI use (relative risk (RR)=2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.45-4.16), and sedative/hypnotics use was associated with a MMSE change of 3 points or more (RR=0.35, 95% CI=0.13-0.93). CEI use had a protective effect on nursing home admission (RR=0.095, 95% CI=0.03-0.30), whereas higher scores on the BDRS for ADLs increased risk of admission at 24- and 36-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: CEI use had a clinically meaningful effect on the natural history of AD. Patients taking CEIs were 2.5 times more likely to progress slowly and had a lower risk of nursing home admission after 2 years, even after controlling for multiple factors that can alter the course of the disease, and a slower rate of decline during the first year of follow-up.
Authors: Xingbin Wang; Oscar L Lopez; Robert A Sweet; James T Becker; Steven T DeKosky; Mahmud M Barmada; F Yesim Demirci; M Ilyas Kamboh Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Weiming Luo; Qian-Sheng Yu; Santosh S Kulkarni; Damon A Parrish; Harold W Holloway; David Tweedie; Avigdor Shafferman; Debomoy K Lahiri; Arnold Brossi; Nigel H Greig Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-04-06 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Alistair Burns; Andrew Yeates; Latif Akintade; Megan Del Valle; Richard Y Zhang; Elias M Schwam; Carlos A Perdomo Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Xingbin Wang; Oscar Lopez; Robert A Sweet; James T Becker; Steven T DeKosky; Mahmud M Barmada; Eleanor Feingold; F Yesim Demirci; M Ilyas Kamboh Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: David Wilkinson; Rachel Schindler; Elias Schwam; Gunhild Waldemar; Roy W Jones; Serge Gauthier; Oscar L Lopez; Jeffrey Cummings; Yikang Xu; Howard H Feldman Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Mohammad A Kamal; Xianqin Qu; Qian-Sheng Yu; David Tweedie; Harold W Holloway; Yazhou Li; Yi Tan; Nigel H Greig Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.575