Literature DB >> 15664575

Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema.

S A Taylor1, S Halligan, D Burling, P Bassett, C I Bartram.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the subjective acceptability of CT colonography in comparison with barium enema in older symptomatic patients, and to ascertain preferences for future colonic investigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 78 persons aged 60 years or over with symptoms suggestive of colorectal neoplasia, who underwent CT colonography followed the same day by barium enema. A 25-point questionnaire was administered after each procedure and an additional follow-up questionnaire a week later. Responses were compared using Wilcoxon matched pairs testing, Mann-Whitney test statistics and binomial exact testing.
RESULTS: Participants suffered less physical discomfort during CT colonography (p = 0.03) and overall satisfaction was greater compared with barium enema (p = 0.03). On follow-up, respondents reported significantly better tolerance of CT colonography (p = 0.002), and were less prepared to undergo barium enema again (p < 0.001). Of 52 subjects expressing an opinion, all preferred CT to barium enema.
CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction was higher with CT colonography than barium enema. CT colonography caused significantly less physical discomfort and was overwhelmingly preferred by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15664575     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  4 in total

1.  European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Steve Halligan; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.

Authors:  A Pollentine; A Mortimer; P McCoubrie; L Archer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.

Authors:  A Pollentine; E Ngan-Soo; P McCoubrie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Glenn Salkeld; Michael Pignone; Peter Hewett; Peter Cheung; Julie Olsen; Wayne Clapton; Ian C Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.725

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.