Literature DB >> 1566184

Intraoperative measurement of lumbar spinal instability.

S Ebara1, T Harada, N Hosono, M Inoue, M Tanaka, Y Morimoto, K Ono.   

Abstract

To justify lumbar fusion or stabilization, a quantitative assessment and definition of spinal instability are essential. To quantify spinal instability, the tensile stiffness of a motion segment (vertebra-disc-vertebra) was measured with a spinal distractor during spinal decompression surgery. Stiffness was indicated by the relationship between load and displacement between the two adjacent spinous processes where a vertebral spreader was suspended. A load-displacement curve was recorded at each step of surgical decompression and fixation while the motion segment was being distracted at a constant speed. The device used for measuring stiffness of a spinal motion segment is a lumbar spinal spreader with a load strain gauge and a displacement transducer. The stiffness of a spinal motion segment was reduced as disc degeneration developed. Degenerative spondylolisthetic discs showed the least stiffness (lowest, 3.9 N/mm; average, 5.4 N/mm). The stiffness of herniated discs, however, was relatively greater (average, 11.8 N/mm). The stiffness of normal motion segments was greater than affected segments. If the stiffness of a motion segment before decompression was graded as 100, it was reduced to 82% after partial laminectomy and facetectomy and to 65% after discectomy on average. After interbody fusion by iliac bone graft, it increased to 133% and to 184%, after Luque fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1566184     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199203001-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Intraoperative determination of the load–displacement behavior of scoliotic spinal motion segments: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Christoph Reutlinger; Carol Hasler; Klaus Scheffler; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of segmental instability in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegewa; Ko Kitahara; Toshiaki Hara; Ko Takano; Haruka Shimoda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical application of a handy intraoperative measurement device for lumbar segmental instability.

Authors:  Yuichi Kasai; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Koji Akeda; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J D Rompe; P Eysel; C Hopf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical instability of the lumbar spine after microdiscectomy.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Failed back surgery syndrome: the role of symptomatic segmental single-level instability after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Adjacent segmental degeneration following Wallis interspinous stabilization implantation: Biomechanical explanations and the value of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhou; Wei Xiong; Li Li; Feng Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Short-term and long-term revision rates after lumbar spine discectomy versus laminectomy: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Feng-Chen Kao; Yao-Chun Hsu; Chang-Bi Wang; Yuan-Kun Tu; Pao-Hsin Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.