Literature DB >> 15661824

Human postural sway results from frequent, ballistic bias impulses by soleus and gastrocnemius.

Ian D Loram1, Constantinos N Maganaris, Martin Lakie.   

Abstract

It has been widely assumed for nearly a century, that postural muscles operate in a spring-like manner and that muscle length signals joint angle (the mechano-reflex mechanism). Here we employ automated analysis of ultrasound images to resolve calf muscle (soleus and gastrocnemius) length changes as small as 10 mum in standing subjects. Previously, we have used balancing of a real inverted pendulum to make predictions about human standing. Here we test and confirm these predictions on 10 subjects standing quietly. We show that on average the calf muscles are actively adjusted 2.6 times per second and 2.8 times per unidirectional sway of the body centre of mass (CoM). These alternating, small (30-300 microm) movements provide impulsive, ballistic regulation of CoM movement. The timing and pattern of these adjustments are consistent with multisensory integration of all information regarding motion of the CoM, pattern recognition, prediction and planning using internal models and are not consistent with control solely by local reflexes. Because the system is unstable, errors in stabilization provide a perturbation which grows into a sway which has to be reacted to and corrected. Sagittal sway results from this impulsive control of calf muscle activity rather than internal sources (e.g. the heart, breathing). This process is quite unlike the mechano-reflex paradigm. We suggest that standing is a skilled, trial and error activity that improves with experience and is automated (possibly by the cerebellum). These results complement and extend our recent demonstration that paradoxical muscle movements are the norm in human standing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15661824      PMCID: PMC1456055          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  47 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance?

Authors:  I D Loram; S M Kelly; M Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Innate versus learned movements--a false dichotomy?

Authors:  Sten Grillner; Peter Wallén
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 5.  Why and how are posture and movement coordinated?

Authors:  Jean Massion; Alexei Alexandrov; Alexander Frolov
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  More pulsating movement.

Authors:  Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Is lower leg proprioception essential for triggering human automatic postural responses?

Authors:  B R Bloem; J H Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A mathematical analysis of the force-stiffness characteristics of muscles in control of a single joint system.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; M A Arbib
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  85 in total

1.  Imperceptible electrical noise attenuates isometric plantar flexion force fluctuations with correlated reductions in postural sway.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Recruitment of motor units in the medial gastrocnemius muscle during human quiet standing: is recruitment intermittent? What triggers recruitment?

Authors:  Taian M M Vieira; Ian D Loram; Silvia Muceli; Roberto Merletti; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vestibular contribution to balance control in the medial gastrocnemius and soleus.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Martin E Héroux; Billy L Luu; John Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Regional modulation of the ankle plantarflexor muscles associated with standing external perturbations across different directions.

Authors:  J W Cohen; A Gallina; T D Ivanova; T Vieira; D J McAndrew; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Paradoxical muscle contractions and the neural control of movement and balance.

Authors:  Richard C Fitzpatrick; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Observations from unperturbed closed loop systems cannot indicate causality.

Authors:  H van der Kooij; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Low-frequency common modulation of soleus motor unit discharge is enhanced during postural control in humans.

Authors:  G Mochizuki; J G Semmler; T D Ivanova; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Multisensory information for postural control: sway-referencing gain shapes center of pressure variability and temporal dynamics.

Authors:  Sean Clark; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process.

Authors:  Martin Lakie; Ian D Loram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Peter J Gawthrop; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.