Literature DB >> 1566159

Complications in three-column cervical spine injuries requiring anterior-posterior stabilization.

G R Cybulski1, R A Douglas, P R Meyer, R A Rovin.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to elicit the hidden factors that, when identified, would signal the presence of cervical spine instability. Data were derived from the records and radiographs of 21 patients having sustained traumatic injury to the lower cervical spine (C3-C7) and who failed a single-stage posterior stabilization procedure necessitating a second (or combined) anterior-posterior arthrodesis. Mechanism of injury most frequently identified in this group was the distraction-flexion (locked facets) pattern (nine patients) and the "tear drop" compression-flexion injury pattern (seven patients). All 21 patients underwent a posterior wiring and bone graft stabilization procedure with persistent postoperative instability. Thus, failure to recognize the presence of "three-column" instability, the sine qua non of this group, resulted in the failure of posterior tension band stabilization as a means of gaining cervical spine stability. Three-column cervical spine instability is suspected in the presence of: 1) retrolisthesis and angulation of the superior vertebra on the next inferior vertebra; 2) distraction of the posterior interspinous ligaments sufficient to allow subluxation or dislocation of the facets; in conjunction with 3) a "shear" dislocation of one vertebra on another. Anterior shearing force through the disc space is capable of disrupting the intervertebral disc, along with disruption of the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, each contributing to the presence of anterior and middle column cervical spine instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1566159     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199203000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a new expandable vertebral body replacement combined with a new polyaxial antero-lateral plate and/or pedicle screws and rods.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Kuno Weise; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of a novel anterior-only approach and the conventional posterior-anterior approach for cervical facet dislocation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Zhengfeng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Utility of MRI for cervical spine clearance after blunt traumatic injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Malhotra; Xiao Wu; Vivek B Kalra; Holly K Grossetta Nardini; Renu Liu; Khalid M Abbed; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Current and future surgery strategies for spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Sedat Dalbayrak; Onur Yaman; Tevfik Yılmaz
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

5.  Utility of MRI for cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma patients after a negative CT.

Authors:  Ajay Malhotra; David Durand; Xiao Wu; Bertie Geng; Khalid Abbed; Diego B Nunez; Pina Sanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Sub-axial cervical spine injuries: Modified Stellerman's algorithm.

Authors:  Arjun Shetty; Abhishek R Kini; Deepak Muthappa
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 7.  Cervical injuries scored according to the Subaxial Injury Classification system: An analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Alpesh A Patel; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2014-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.