Literature DB >> 15660969

The incidence of aneuploidy in human oocytes assessed by conventional cytogenetic analysis.

Bernd Rosenbusch1.   

Abstract

Human oocytes failing to fertilize during assisted reproduction are an important source of information for assessing incidence and causal mechanisms of maternal aneuploidy. This review describes the techniques of conventional oocyte chromosome analysis and evaluates the results of 59 studies comprising a total of>10,000 female gametes. The mean rate of aneuploidy (hypohaploidy + hyperhaploidy) amounts to approximately 20%, but this incidence is reduced as soon as possible artifacts introduced by the fixation technique are taken into consideration. It is therefore concluded that a realistic value for numerical abnormalities arising during first meiotic division lies between 12 and 15%. All chromosome groups are affected by aneuploidy but the actually observed frequencies exceed the expected frequencies in groups D, E, and G. Two aneuploidy-causing mechanisms have been identified in human oocytes: nondisjunction, resulting in the loss or gain of whole chromosomes, and predivision, resulting in the loss or gain of single chromatids. A brief analysis including only aneuploid complements with one extra or missing chromosome/chromatid shows a slight increase in predivision (52.9%) compared with nondisjunction (47.1%). Finally, suggestions for future studies are given since, for instance, the presentation of results and the use of cytogenetic nomenclature have not been uniform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15660969     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01803.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hereditas        ISSN: 0018-0661            Impact factor:   3.271


  9 in total

1.  Human oocyte chromosome analyses need a standardized presentation of the results.

Authors:  Bernd Rosenbusch
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  The frequency of precocious segregation of sister chromatids in mouse female meiosis I is affected by genetic background.

Authors:  Anna Danylevska; Kristina Kovacovicova; Thuraya Awadova; Martin Anger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Constitutional and acquired autosomal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Colleen Jackson-Cook
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.935

4.  Cytogenetic evidence for diversity of two nuclei within a single diplomonad cell of Giardia.

Authors:  Pavla Tůmová; Klára Hofstetrová; Eva Nohýnková; Ondrej Hovorka; Jirí Král
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Sex-biased gene expression on the avian Z chromosome: highly expressed genes show higher male-biased expression.

Authors:  Sara Naurin; Dennis Hasselquist; Staffan Bensch; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The sex-biased brain: sexual dimorphism in gene expression in two species of songbirds.

Authors:  Sara Naurin; Bengt Hansson; Dennis Hasselquist; Yong-Hwan Kim; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation.

Authors:  Vaijayanti Gupta; Michael Parisi; David Sturgill; Rachel Nuttall; Michael Doctolero; Olga K Dudko; James D Malley; P Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2006-02-16

Review 8.  Neuronal aneuploidy in health and disease: a cytomic approach to understand the molecular individuality of neurons.

Authors:  Thomas Arendt; Birgit Mosch; Markus Morawski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Insights into Avian Incomplete Dosage Compensation: Sex-Biased Gene Expression Coevolves with Sex Chromosome Degeneration in the Common Whitethroat.

Authors:  Hanna Sigeman; Suvi Ponnikas; Elin Videvall; Hongkai Zhang; Pallavi Chauhan; Sara Naurin; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.