Literature DB >> 15660580

Ultrapure dialysate.

Richard A Ward1.   

Abstract

To prevent pyrogenic reactions during hemodialysis, it is recommended that bacteria and endotoxin in dialysate not exceed 100-200 colony forming units (CFU)/ml and 0.25-2 endotoxin units (EU)/ml, respectively. While these limits are adequate to prevent acute pyrogenic reactions, data are accumulating to suggest they may not prevent stimulation of chronic inflammation in hemodialysis patients. Fragments of endotoxin and other bacterial products capable of stimulating immune cells cross low-flux and high-flux membranes in vitro. In clinical studies, use of ultrapure dialysate (bacteria < 0.1 CFU/ml and endotoxin < 0.03 EU/ml) is associated with lower concentrations of inflammatory markers and acute phase reactants than are observed with dialysate meeting current quality recommendations. Moreover, observational studies suggest a link between clinical outcomes and dialysate purity. Treatment of patients with ultrapure dialysate is reported to improve nutritional status, increase responsiveness to erythropoietin, slow the decline in residual renal function, lessen cardiovascular morbidity, and decrease the incidence of beta(2)-microglobulin amyloidosis. To date, however, none of these studies has shown a cause-and-effect relationship between dialysate purity and outcome. Further, there are no data defining the concentration dependence of outcomes on dialysate purity and the relative importance of dialysate purity as a trigger of inflammation remains unclear. While the technology exists to routinely provide ultrapure dialysate, controlled clinical trials are still needed to answer the question of whether or not introducing ultrapure dialysate into routine clinical practice represents an efficient use of limited resources in terms of decreasing inflammation and improving outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15660580     DOI: 10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  9 in total

1.  Effect of Different Dialysis Methods on Cellular Immunity Function of Maintenance Haemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  L Xing
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 0.171

Review 2.  Hemodialysis and water quality.

Authors:  Angela D Coulliette; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Hemodialysis Emergencies.

Authors:  Manish Saha; Michael Allon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Strategies for the preservation of residual renal function in pediatric dialysis patients.

Authors:  Melissa A Cadnapaphornchai; Isaac Teitelbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Inflammatory Response to Sorbent Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Laura Rosales; Stephan Thijssen; Anja Kruse; Murat Hairy Sipahioglu; Padam Hirachan; Jochen G Raimann; Viktoriya Kuntsevich; Mary Carter; Nathan W Levin; Peter Kotanko
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Comparison of the impact of high-flux dialysis on mortality in hemodialysis patients with and without residual renal function.

Authors:  Hyung Wook Kim; Su-Hyun Kim; Young Ok Kim; Dong Chan Jin; Ho Chul Song; Euy Jin Choi; Yong-Lim Kim; Yon-Su Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Nam-Ho Kim; Chul Woo Yang; Yong Kyun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation and applicability of an alternative method for dialysis water and dialysate quality analysis.

Authors:  Gabriela Corrêa Carvalho; Adriana Bugno; Adriana Aparecida Buzzo Almodovar; Fernando Pontes de Lima E Silva; Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli Pinto
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2020-04-30

8.  Benefits of the Nephros Dual Stage Ultrafilter in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients: Evidence for Improved ESA Responsiveness.

Authors:  Anthony Valeri; Bobby Lee; John Duffy; Robin Ferrer; Ronald Vilotta
Journal:  Case Rep Nephrol Dial       Date:  2016-01-13

9.  Factors associated with residual urine volume preservation in patients undergoing hemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease in Kinshasa.

Authors:  Vieux Momeme Mokoli; Ernest Kiswaya Sumaili; François Bompeka Lepira; Fiston Ikwa Ndol Mbutiwi; Jean Robert Rissassy Makulo; Justine Busanga Bukabau; Patrick Parmba Izeidi; Jeannine Losa Luse; Stéphane Kalambay Mukendi; Désiré Kulimba Mashinda; Nazaire Mangani Nseka
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.388

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.