Literature DB >> 15660477

Impediments to the diffusion of innovative medicines in Europe.

Oliver Schöffski1.   

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry has developed many innovative medicines, which are able to extend the life expectancy of patients to increase their quality of life and often to reduce expenditures in the health care sector as a whole. Although these medicines are available in principle for all eligible patients throughout Europe, not everyone receives adequate treatment. There is a huge difference between a possible optimal treatment and the treatment delivered to the patient. In some cases patients are not treated at all; in some cases they only receive outdated medicines (e.g. with lower effectiveness and/or more severe side effects); and in some cases the prescribed dosages of the innovative drugs are too low to be effective. This study gives an overview of the shortfalls in provision of state-of-the-art medicines in selected European countries for about 20 of the most relevant diseases. The following five different groups of factors can be identified as leading to this insufficient diffusion of medicines and are discussed in this text: (i) patient-related factors; (ii) healthcare professional-related factors; (iii) industry-related factors; (iv) system-related (long-term) factors; and (v) policy-related (short-term) factors. It must be clear that these shortages are not isolated cases but general trends in Europe, which have to be discussed in public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15660477     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422002-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  12 in total

1.  Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente.

Authors:  Richard G A Feachem; Neelam K Sekhri; Karen L White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19

2.  Are the benefits of newer drugs worth their cost? Evidence from the 1996 MEPS.

Authors:  F R Lichtenberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The clinical practice improvement (CPI) model and how it is used to examine the availability of pharmaceuticals and the utilisation of ambulatory healthcare services in HMOs. Results from the Managed Care Outcomes Project (MCOP).

Authors:  S D Horn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Depression in the community: the first pan-European study DEPRES (Depression Research in European Society).

Authors:  J P Lépine; M Gastpar; J Mendlewicz; A Tylee
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.659

5.  Inequality in funding for AIDS across England threatens regional services.

Authors:  M A Bellis; J McCullagh; R Thomson; D Regan; Q Syed; T Kelly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-11

6.  Outpatient costs of osteoporosis in a national health insurance population.

Authors:  J Krappweis; A Rentsch; U I Schwarz; K J Krobot; W Kirch
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  [Description of type 2 diabetes mellitus in residents of Ile-de-France aged at most 70 years].

Authors:  L Silvera; D Simon; B Trutt; B Blanchon; M Parmentier; P Hecquard
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.041

8.  Multicentre study of cancer pain and its treatment in France.

Authors:  F Larue; S M Colleau; L Brasseur; C S Cleeland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-22

9.  Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study.

Authors:  R Grol; J Dalhuijsen; S Thomas; C Veld; G Rutten; H Mokkink
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-26

10.  Oncologists and primary care physicians' attitudes toward pain control and morphine prescribing in France.

Authors:  F Larue; S M Colleau; A Fontaine; L Brasseur
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.