Literature DB >> 7728056

Multicentre study of cancer pain and its treatment in France.

F Larue1, S M Colleau, L Brasseur, C S Cleeland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment of cancer pain in France and to evaluate the predictive factors for inadequate management.
DESIGN: Multicentre, representative cross sectional survey.
SETTING: 20 treatment centres, including cancer centres, university hospitals, state hospitals, private clinics, and one homecare setting (in which patients are supported at home).
SUBJECTS: 605 patients with cancer. MAIN MEASURES: Patients rated prevalence and severity of pain and functional impairment related to pain. Doctors reported patients' cancer characteristic, performance status, pain severity, and analgesic drugs ordered.
RESULTS: 57% (340/601) of patients with cancer reported pain due to their disease, and, of those with pain, 69% (224/325) rated their worst pain at a level that impaired their ability to function. 30% (84/279) were reported as receiving no drugs for their pain. Of the 270 patients in pain for whom information on treatment was available 51% (137/270) were not receiving adequate pain relief, according to an index based on the World Health Organisation's guidelines. French doctors were found to underestimate the severity of their patients' pain. Younger patients, patients without metastatic disease, patients with a better performance status, and patients who rated their pain as more severe than their doctors did were at greater risk for undertreatment of their pain.
CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the high prevalence and the severity of pain among patients with cancer, the assessment and treatment of cancer pain in France remain inadequate, emphasising the need for changes in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7728056      PMCID: PMC2549429          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6986.1034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

Review 1.  Research in cancer pain. What we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  C Cleeland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  France: status of cancer pain and palliative care.

Authors:  L Brasseur; F Larue
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  The prevalence of pain in four cancers.

Authors:  H P Greenwald; J J Bonica; M Bergner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  The treatment of cancer pain.

Authors:  K M Foley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The prevalence and severity of pain in cancer.

Authors:  R L Daut; C S Cleeland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Physician attitudes and practice in cancer pain management. A survey from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  J H Von Roenn; C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; K J Pandya
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  46 in total

1.  Managing patients with lung cancer. Effective communication, palliative care, and guidelines are needed.

Authors:  M Costantini; I J Higginson; C C Farsides; F Toscani; S Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

2.  Clinicians' practice and attitudes toward cancer pain management in Korea.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Jeon; Hoon Kyo Kim; Charles S Cleeland; Xin Shelley Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Palliative care in primary care: a study to determine whether patients and professionals agree on symptoms.

Authors:  Gail Ewing; Margaret Rogers; Stephen Barclay; Janet McCabe; Anna Martin; Malcolm Campbell; Chris Todd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Strategies for the treatment of cancer pain in the new millennium.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; E D Dickerson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The Brief Pain Inventory and its "pain at its worst in the last 24 hours" item: clinical trial endpoint considerations.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Tito R Mendoza; Laura Sit; Steven Passik; Howard I Scher; Charles Cleeland; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Treatment for cancer pain in France.

Authors:  M Zenz; T Zenz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

7.  A cross-sectional survey of pain in palliative care in Portugal.

Authors:  Ferraz Gonçalves; Ana Almeida; Catarina Antunes; Maria Cardoso; Margarida Carvalho; Maria Claro; Francisca Coimbra; Inês Diniz; Bruno Fonseca; Emília Fradique; Edna Gonçalves; Florbela Gonçalves; Maria Gonçalves; Américo Magalhães; Paulo Pina; Conceição Pires; Paula Silva; Ricardo Silva; Rui Silva; Filipa Tavares; Laura Teixeira
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Leeroy William; Rod Macleod
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Randomized clinical trial of an intensive nursing-based pain education program for cancer outpatients suffering from pain.

Authors:  Evelien H van der Peet; Marieke H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; Jacob Patijn; Harry C Schouten; Maarten van Kleef; Annemie M Courtens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Are joint and soft tissue injections painful? Results of a national French cross-sectional study of procedural pain in rheumatological practice.

Authors:  Serge Perrot; Françoise Laroche; Coralie Poncet; Pierre Marie; Catherine Payen-Champenois
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.