Literature DB >> 15660214

Expression of SARS-coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in Escherichia coli and Lactococcus lactis for serodiagnosis and mucosal vaccination.

Huadong Pei1, Jingfang Liu, Yun Cheng, Chaomin Sun, Chen Wang, Yueping Lu, Jie Ding, Jian Zhou, Hua Xiang.   

Abstract

The nucleocapsid (N) protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is an important antigen for the early diagnosis of SARS and the development of vaccines. It was expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion with human glutathione S-transferase (hGST) and was confirmed by Western blotting analysis. This recombinant N protein (hGST-N) was purified and used to measure the SARS-CoV N-specific antibody in the sera of eight SARS patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Specific antibody response to this purified recombinant N protein was 100% positive in the SARS patients' sera, while none of the control sera from 30 healthy people gave a positive reaction in the same assay. The SARS-CoV N protein was also expressed in Lactococcus lactis in the cytoplasm or secreted into the medium. The N-producing strain MG1363/pSECN and the purified hGST-N protein were respectively administered to mice, either orally or intranasally. Results indicated that orally delivered MG1363/pSECN induced significant N-specific IgG in the sera. In conclusion, our work provides a novel strategy to produce the SARS-CoV N protein for serodiagnosis and for L. lactis-based mucosal vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660214      PMCID: PMC7079895          DOI: 10.1007/s00253-004-1869-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


Introduction

The etiologic agent of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerging worldwide in 2003 has been identified as a novel type of coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which consists of a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of about 29,700 nucleotides, encoding a RNA-directed RNA polymerase and structural proteins including the spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins (Marra et al. 2003; Rota et al. 2003; Ruan et al. 2003). The N protein is a 422-amino-acid alkaline protein with a short lysine-rich region suggested as the nuclear localization signal. It plays an important role in the process of virus particle assembly by enveloping the entire genomic RNA (Marra et al. 2003). The SARS-CoV N protein has been suggested as a potent antigen for the early diagnosis of SARS-CoV infection (Timani et al. 2004). Moreover, recent evidence indicates that the N protein can induce a T-cell response to SARS-CoV infection (Gao et al. 2003); and thus the N protein is also important in the development of an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV infection. Because of their edibility and convenience, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been safely used in the food industry for centuries and are considered as potential mucosal delivery vehicles of vaccine antigens (Dieye et al. 2001, 2003; Gilbert et al. 2000; Robinson et al. 1997). LAB-based vaccines can effectively achieve mucosal and systemic immunization at mucosal sites, which are the entry routes of many pathogens including SARS-CoV and HIV. For instance, Lactococcus lactis has been used as a vaccine delivery system for the HIV Env protein. Oral administration of this recombinant vaccine antigen induces strong HIV-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses which significantly reduce the viral load following challenge with an Env-expressing vaccinia virus (Xin et al. 2003). In this paper, we report the high-level production of SARS-CoV N protein in Escherichia coli and in the food-grade bacterium L. lactis. The potential applications of the purified human glutathione S-transferase (hGST)-fused N protein (hGST-N) in serodiagnosis and the N protein-producing L. lactis in mucosal vaccination were both experimentally evaluated.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, media and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. E. coli strains were grown in Luria–Bertani medium at 37°C or 30°C (when induced) with shaking, while L. lactis strains were grown in GM17 medium at 30°C without shaking, as described by Dieye et al. (2003) and Xiang et al. (2003). When necessary, antibiotics and inducers were added as follows: for E. coli, ampicillin (100 μg ml−1), erythromycin (150 μg ml−1), chloramphenicol (20 μg ml−1) and isopropyl thiogalactose (IPTG; 1 mmol l−1); and for L. lactis, erythromycin (5 μg ml−1) and nisin (50 ng ml−1).
Table 1

Strains and plasmids. pXN was obtained from the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences, according to cooperation contract SIBS-SARS-IP-005. Amp ampicillin, Cm chloramphenicol, Ery erythromycin

Strain or plasmidRelevant characteristicsSource or reference
Strains
E. coli JM109 and TG1Host for cloningSambrook et al. (1989)
E. coli BL21DE3Host for gene expressionNovagen
L. lactis MG1363Plasmid-free strainGasson (1983)
L. lactis NZ9000Derivative of MG1363 carrying regulatory genes nisR and nisKKuipers et al. (1998)
Plasmids
pXNAmpr; SARS-CoV nucleocapsid gene (n) was cloned in pcDNA3.1(-)mychisASIBS
pGEX4T-1Ampr; E. coli expression vector; Ptac promoterAmersham Biosciences
pGEXNAmpr; the n gene was inserted into the BamHI-SalI sites of pGEX4T-1This work
pET23bAmpr; E. coli expression vector; PT7 promoterNovagen
pET23bNAmpr; the n gene was inserted into the BamHI-SalI sites of pET23bThis work
pT7hGSTAmpr; the hGST gene was inserted into the NdeI-BamHI sites of pET23bThis work
pT7hGSTNAmpr; the n gene was inserted into the BamHI-SalI site of pT7hGSTThis work
pNZ8048Cmr;; L. lactis expression vector; PNisA promoterKuipers et al. (1998)
pCYTNCmr; the n gene was inserted into the NcoI-XbaI sites of pNZ8048This work
pVE5523Ampr; Eryr; L. lactis expression vector; P59 promoter; spUsp45 signal peptide sequenceDieye et al. (2001)
pSECNAmpr; Eryr; n gene was inserted into pVE5523 at the SalI-EcoRV sitesThis work
Strains and plasmids. pXN was obtained from the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences, according to cooperation contract SIBS-SARS-IP-005. Amp ampicillin, Cm chloramphenicol, Ery erythromycin

DNA manipulations

General molecular biological techniques were performed using standard methods (Sambrook et al. 1989). Unless otherwise indicated, the cDNA of the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid gene (n) was always amplified by PCR with Pfu polymerase, using plasmid pXN (see Table 1) as the template. The primers used in the following gene cloning procedures are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Primers. Restriction enzyme sites are in italics

NameSequence (5′→3′)Restriction enzyme
P1FTAGGATCCGATGTCTGATAATGGACCCCABamHI
P1RCTGTCGACTTATGCCTGAGTTGAATCAGCSalI
P2FTAGGATCCATGTCTGATAATGGACCCCABamHI
P2RCTGTCGACTTATGCCTGAGTTGAA TCSalI
P3FTCCATATGGCAGAGAAGCCCAAGCNdeI
P3RTAGGATCCAAACCTGAAAATCTTCCTTGCBamHI
P4FTACCATGGCAATGTCTGATAATGGACCCCANcoI
P4RCTTCTAGATTATGCCTGAGTTGAATCAGCXbaI
P5FTAGTCGACTGTCTGATAATGGACCCCASalI
P5RCTGATATCTTATGCCTGAGTTGAATCAGCEcoRV
Primers. Restriction enzyme sites are in italics For expression and characterization of the N protein in E. coli, three different expression plasmids were constructed (Fig. 1). For the first one, the n gene was PCR-amplified with primers P1F/P1R. The PCR product was digested with BamHI and SalI and then cloned into the same sites of pET23b, yielding pET23bN (Fig. 1a). For the second one, the n gene was amplified with primers P2F/P2R and cloned into the BamHI/SalI-linearized pGEX4T-1, generating pGEXN (Fig. 1b). For the third one, the hgst gene was amplified from pET23b::hgst (Xiang et al. 2003) with primers P3F/P3R and digested with NdeI and BamHI. At the same time, the n gene was generated from pGEXN by digestion with BamHI and SalI. These two DNA fragments were cloned into pET23b together at the NdeI and SalI sites, resulting in plasmid pT7hGSTN (Fig. 1c). All these plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21DE3 for N protein production and/or purification.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of plasmid constructs expressing SARS-CoV N protein in E. coli and L. lactis. a pET23bN, b pGEXN, c pT7hGSTN, d pCYTN, e pSECN. Detailed information on these expression plasmids is given in Table 1

Schematic diagram of plasmid constructs expressing SARS-CoV N protein in E. coli and L. lactis. a pET23bN, b pGEXN, c pT7hGSTN, d pCYTN, e pSECN. Detailed information on these expression plasmids is given in Table 1 For expression of the N protein in the cytoplasm of L. lactis or secretion into the culture medium, two expression plasmids were also constructed. For the first one, the n gene was amplified with primers P4F/P4R. After digestion with NcoI and XbaI, it was cloned into pNZ8048 at the same sites, generating pCYTN for nisin-induced production of the N protein (Fig. 1d). For the second one, the n gene was PCR-amplified with primers P5F/P5R and cloned into plasmid pVE5523 (Dieye et al. 2001) at the SalI and EcoRV sites, resulting in plasmid pSECN for secretion of the N protein (Fig. 1e). These two expression plamids, pCYTN and pSECN, were first established in E. coli and then transferred by electroporation into L. lactis NZ9000 and MG1363, respectively, as described by Xiang et al. (2000).

Production and purification of SARS-CoV N protein in E. coli

E. coli BL21DE3 harboring the expression plasmids was cultured until the mid-exponential phase [optical density at 600 nm (OD600)=0.4–0.6] and then induced with IPTG (1 mM) for an additional 3–4 h at 30°C with shaking (180 rpm). The cells were collected and the pellets were resuspended in TES buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 25% sucrose, pH 5.8) and sonicated for 3–5 min until completely lysed. The fusion protein hGST-N (generated from pT7hGSTN) or GST-N (generated from pGEXN) was purified through a glutathioneagarose column (Amersham Biosciences), according to methods described by Xiang et al. (2000, 2003).

Preparation of antiserum against SARS-CoV N protein

For antiserum preparation, approximately 2 mg of purified GST-N mixed with Freund’s complete adjuvant were injected into a healthy New Zealand rabbit three times, once per week. Antiserum was collected from the marginal vein of the rabbit’s ear at day 30 and was used for Western blotting analysis.

Immunoassay detection of N-specific antibody in the sera of SARS patients

Purified hGST-N protein (50 ng) dissolved in 100 μl of coating buffer (16 mM Na2CO3, 34 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6), was added a 96-well microplate (50 ng/well) and incubated at 4°C overnight. Wells were then blocked with 7% non-fat milk in PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.3), incubated for 1 h at room temperature, washed three times with PBS and then dried at 37°C for 1 h. To detect the N-specific antibody in the sera of SARS patients, the sera were diluted (1:25) and loaded in the wells in triplicate and then incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Each well was washed with PBS and afterwards incubated with peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-human antibody (IgG) for an additional 30 min. The wells were washed again with PBS containing 0.5% Tween-20. The peroxidase reaction was performed at 37°C, using O-phenylenediamine as the substrate. After 10 min, the reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl of 1 M H2SO4 to each well, and the OD450 was read. For comparison, the same samples were assayed with a widely used commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit based on a SARS-CoV viral protein mixture prepared by the Beijing Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The cutoff value was defined as the average OD450 of control samples plus 0.1.

Expression and detection of SARS-CoV N protein in L. lactis

For expression of the N protein in the cytoplasm of L. lactis, cultures of NZ9000/pCYTN were induced with nisin (10 ng ml−1; Sigma) at the mid-exponential phase (OD600=0.6). After 3–6 h, the cells were harvested and resuspended in TES buffer for protein extraction by sonication. For secretion of the N protein by L. lactis, the recombinant strain L. lactis MG1363/pSECN was cultivated to the late-exponential phase (OD600=0.8). Proteins in the medium and cells were separately prepared as described by Piard et al. (1997) and Dieye et al. (2003), with minor modifications. Briefly, The supernatant (medium part) of the culture was filtered (0.2-μm pore size filter; Millipore) and then the proteins in the filtrate were precipitated with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (16% final concentration). The resulting pellets from 4 ml of filtrate were dissolved in 80 μl of water for analysis. In contrast, the cell pellets from the same culture were washed and resuspended in 500 μl of TES for protein extraction by sonication. For Western blotting analysis, the protein extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE (12% acrylamide) and the SARS-CoV N protein expressed in L. lactis was detected with the N-specific antisera generated by GST-N in the above experiments. The N protein expressed by E. coli BL21DE3/pET23bN was used as a control. The protein electro-blotting, antibody reaction and detection were performed as described by Wei et al. (2002).

Mouse vaccination

Recombinant strain L. lactis MG1363/pSECN and control strain MG1363 were grown and harvested as described above. For MG1363, cells were resuspended in sterile PBS to obtain a concentration of 108 cells ml−1. For strain MG1363/pSECN, the supernatants of the culture (containing the secreted N protein) were collected and filtered as described above and proteins from 3 ml of the filtrate were concentrated into 0.5 ml by freeze-evaporation. Then, the cell pellets were diluted directly into PBS to achieve a concentration of 108 cells in 0.5 ml. Then, the secreted N protein (0.5 ml) and the cells (0.5 ml) were combined into 1.0 ml. For mouse vaccination, six groups of BALB/c female mice (five mice in each group) were immunized orally or intranasally with the recombinant strains, the control strains, or the purified hGST-N resuspended in PBS, respectively. Oral doses of 15 μg of hGST-N, or 107 cells (110 μl of L. lactis MG1363/pSECN or MG1363 cells, freshly prepared as described above), were administered orally on days 1, 2, 4 and 22. Intranasal doses of 1.5 μg hGST-N, or 2.5×106 cells (25 μl, as described above) were slowly administered to mice on days 1, 2, 4 and 22. Another non-immunized control group was maintained under the same conditions. The immune sera (collected by retro-orbital puncture) were collected 12 days after final immunization and used to evaluate the immunogenicity of both the recombinant L. lactis strain and the purified hGST-N, using ELISA as described above.

Results

Expression and purification of SARS-N protein in E. coli

The full-length fragment of the n gene was cloned and expressed in E. coli BL21DE3 using two different expression plasmids, pT7hGSTN and pGEXN, as described in Fig. 1 and Table 1. The inserts in both plasmids were sequenced and proved to be correct. After induction with IPTG, the hGST-N from E. coli/pT7hGST and the GST-N from E. coli/pGEXN were both overexpressed, with expected sizes of 73.5 kDa and 72.5 kDa, respectively (Fig. 2). When the supernatants and pellets of each extract prepared by sonication and centrifugation were respectively subjected to SDS-PAGE, it was also determined that most of the recombinant N proteins were soluble rather than forming inclusion bodies (data not shown). This allowed the convenience of purifying the recombinant proteins within the supernatants; and indeed the soluble GST-N and hGST-N were successfully purified through a single step of glutathione-based affinity chromatography (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Expression and purification of SARS-CoV N protein in E. coli. Equal amounts of protein extracts from the following strains (lanes 1–6) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE: lane 1 BL21DE3/pET23b, lane 2 BL21DE3/pT7hGST, lane 3 BL21DE3/pT7hGSTN, lane 4 BL21DE3/pGEX-4T-1, lane 5 BL21DE3/pGEXN, lane 6 BL21DE3/pET23bN. The purified hGST-N and GST-N were loaded in lane 7 and lane 8, respectively. The sizes of molecular mass markers (M) are indicated on the left. kD KiloDaltons

Expression and purification of SARS-CoV N protein in E. coli. Equal amounts of protein extracts from the following strains (lanes 1–6) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE: lane 1 BL21DE3/pET23b, lane 2 BL21DE3/pT7hGST, lane 3 BL21DE3/pT7hGSTN, lane 4 BL21DE3/pGEX-4T-1, lane 5 BL21DE3/pGEXN, lane 6 BL21DE3/pET23bN. The purified hGST-N and GST-N were loaded in lane 7 and lane 8, respectively. The sizes of molecular mass markers (M) are indicated on the left. kD KiloDaltons

Preparation of N-specific antisera in rabbit with GST-N and detection of N-specific antibody in SARS patients with hGST-N

Polyclonal antibodies were prepared in rabbit using GST-N as the immunogen. To verify the specificity of these antibodies against the SARS-CoV N protein, the proteins hGST (from pET23b::hgst), hGST-N and GST-N were subjected to SDS-PAGE for Western blotting analysis. Both hGST-N (73.5 kDa) and GST-N (72.5 kDa) gave a strong signal, but hGST did not (Fig. 3a). These results clearly indicated that the N-specific antibody was successfully induced with the GST-N antigen, as it significantly recognized hGST-N but not hGST. Moreover, it implied that the hGST-N protein might be an effective antigen for detection of the N-specific antibody in SARS patients.
Fig. 3

a Western blotting assay with the specific polyclonal antibodies from GST-N. Note that GST-N from BL21DE3/pGEXN and hGST-N from BL21DE3/pT7hGSTN give positive signals, while hGST from BL21DE3/pT7hGST does not. b ELISA assay of N-specific antibody in SARS patients. CK Sera from 30 healthy people were detected using hGST-N as the antigen, I sera from eight SARS patients were detected using hGST-N as the antigen, II sera from eight SARS patients (the same as in I) were detected with a commercial kit using a SARS-CoV protein mixture as the antigen. The dashed line showed the cutoff value (0.135 = average value of healthy people detected by the commercial kit plus 0.1)

a Western blotting assay with the specific polyclonal antibodies from GST-N. Note that GST-N from BL21DE3/pGEXN and hGST-N from BL21DE3/pT7hGSTN give positive signals, while hGST from BL21DE3/pT7hGST does not. b ELISA assay of N-specific antibody in SARS patients. CK Sera from 30 healthy people were detected using hGST-N as the antigen, I sera from eight SARS patients were detected using hGST-N as the antigen, II sera from eight SARS patients (the same as in I) were detected with a commercial kit using a SARS-CoV protein mixture as the antigen. The dashed line showed the cutoff value (0.135 = average value of healthy people detected by the commercial kit plus 0.1) To investigate the possibility of using hGST-N in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV infection, an ELISA assay (see Materials and methods) was performed with the sera collected from eight SARS-CoV infected patients at 17–30 days after fever onset, using purified hGST-N as the antigen and the sera collected from 30 healthy people as controls. As shown in Fig. 3b, all the sera of the SARS patients had significant positive responses to the hGST-N protein, while none of the 30 control sera gave a positive signal. The same results were also achieved with a commercially available ELISA kit coated with a mixture of SARS-CoV viral proteins, indicating that the IgG antibodies to N protein are commonly present in the sera of SARS patients and can be detected at least as early as 17 days after fever onset. Moreover, our results provide a rapid and efficient strategy for the production and purification of the recombinant N protein for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV infection.

Production and identification of SARS-CoV N protein in L. lactis

SARS-CoV N protein is also considered an important antigen for vaccine development, especially as an adjuvant vaccine antigen for the S protein, the major vaccine antigen that induces neutralizing antibody (Gao et al. 2003). For easy use of this protein in mucosal vaccination, we expressed this protein in the food-grade bacterium L. lactis. First, the production of the recombinant SARS-CoV N protein in L. lactis NZ9000/pCYTN was analyzed before and after nisin induction. The protein extracts from cytoplasm and the medium were both subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting assays with the anti-N antibodies prepared above. In the absence of nisin, no signal was detected, indicating that no recombinant N protein was produced (data not shown). After 6 h of induction with nisin, the results showed that recombinant N protein was present in the cell cytoplasm fractions as expected (Fig. 4a). However, the expression level of N protein in this strain was usually subject to variable induction efficiency. To overcome this inconvenience, we then constructed a novel recombinant strain, L. lactis MG1363 harboring an expression plasmid pSECN, in which the n gene was fused with the coding sequence of USP45 signal peptide and was controlled by the constitutive L. lactis promoter P. Western blotting showed that a prominent band of 46 kDa corresponding to size of the mature N protein was observed in the medium, indicating that the SARS-CoV N protein can be secreted by this recombinant L. lactis strain; and only a few secreted N proteins were degraded (Fig. 4b). However, nearly 60% of the N protein precursor was still in the cytoplasmic fraction (Fig. 4b). Thus, expression of the recombinant N protein in both cytoplasm and medium was realized by strain L. lactis MG1363/pSECN, rendering it suitable for both oral and intranasal administration.
Fig. 4

Western blotting analysis of the expression SARS-CoV N protein in L. lactis strains NZ9000/pCYTN (a) and MG1363/pSECN (b). Lane 1 Proteins extracted from the cytoplasm, lane 2 proteins collected in the culture medium, lane 3 proteins extracted from E. coli BL21DE3/pET23bN as a control. The expressed mature N protein (N) and the precursor of the secreted form (Pre-N) are indicated

Western blotting analysis of the expression SARS-CoV N protein in L. lactis strains NZ9000/pCYTN (a) and MG1363/pSECN (b). Lane 1 Proteins extracted from the cytoplasm, lane 2 proteins collected in the culture medium, lane 3 proteins extracted from E. coli BL21DE3/pET23bN as a control. The expressed mature N protein (N) and the precursor of the secreted form (Pre-N) are indicated

Mucosal immunization of mice with MG1363/pSECN strain and hGST-N protein

Thirty mice were randomly divided into six groups and the five mice in each group were administered orally or intranasally with strain MG1363, strain MG1363/pSECN or purified hGST-N. The effect of immunization on the production of N-specific IgG was examined by ELISA 12 days after the final administration, using purified GST-N (not hGST-N) as the antigen to exclude the interference of hGST. Results indicated that orally administrated MG1363/pSECN induced a very significant response from the N-specific IgG in the sera (P<0.02, t-test). However, oral administration of purified hGST-N did not seem to induce any N-specific response, as it just gave the same background signal in this ELISA inspection as the control strain MG1363 (Fig. 5), indicating that, while the MG1363/pSECN-carried N protein was protected in the gastric tract and could be released in the intestinal mucosal sites, the purified hGST-N might have been degraded in the gastrointestinal environment before reaching the mucosal site. Also, the intranasally administered MG1363/pSECN and hGST-N in this investigation just elicited a very weak N-specific immunization (not significant, P>0.05, t-test, data not shown).
Fig. 5

N-specific antibody levels in groups of mice immunized orally with control strain L. lactis MG1363, purified hGST-N or recombinant strain L. lactis MG1363/pSECN. The sera of the mice in each group were combined and diluted (1:10, 1:100, 1:1000) when subjected to ELISA analysis. The ELISA results were expressed as relative OD450 values, where the OD450 of the sera from the naive mice (Naive) in each dilution was assigned the value of 1.0. * Note that oral administration of MG1363/pSECN induced a significant level of N-specific antibody (P<0.02, t-test)

N-specific antibody levels in groups of mice immunized orally with control strain L. lactis MG1363, purified hGST-N or recombinant strain L. lactis MG1363/pSECN. The sera of the mice in each group were combined and diluted (1:10, 1:100, 1:1000) when subjected to ELISA analysis. The ELISA results were expressed as relative OD450 values, where the OD450 of the sera from the naive mice (Naive) in each dilution was assigned the value of 1.0. * Note that oral administration of MG1363/pSECN induced a significant level of N-specific antibody (P<0.02, t-test)

Discussion

Since SARS broke out in 2003, researchers have made great efforts in the development of fast and accurate analytical methods for its early diagnosis and the development of safe and efficient vaccines against its re-emergence. Although many ELISA diagnostic kits have been invented basing on a viral protein mixture, it does not seem convenient in its preparation, because it requires the cultivation of SARS-CoV. Thus, an alterative simple, sensitive and specific N protein-based ELISA has been investigated in many laboratories (Liu et al. 2004; Timani et al. 2004; Woo et al. 2004). All these investigations suggest that the N protein is immunodominant and is a perfect diagnostic antigen. For this purpose, we developed a simple way to express and purify the SARS-CoV N protein, by fusion with human GST protein. When the purified hGST-N protein was used as a coated antigen in the ELISA assay for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV infection, it showed a high level of sensitivity (100% positive for the eight tested SARS patients) and specificity (100% negative for the 30 tested healthy people). Also, the ELISA signal was even better than that of the commercial kit (Fig. 3b). As the hGST-N protein can be purified in a single step and the fused human GST is believed not to generate antibodies in human sera, it thus provides a significant option for use in the serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV infection. The SARS-CoV N protein is also reported to be important for the enhancement of antibody production and for the generation of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL); and it is suggested that the N protein-induced CTL might play an important role in clearing the infected cells, thereby decreasing the rate of pathogen replication in the mucosal epithelium (Gao et al. 2003; Zhu et al. 2004). Since SARS-CoV infection is through the mucosal membrane,oral or intranasal vaccination might improve the protection efficiency. Thus, two strategies for mucosal vaccination of the N protein have been investigated in our work. One is using the purified hGST-N as the vaccine antigen and the other is using N-expression L. lactis as a live vaccine. For the first one, since hGST is safe for human beings, hGST-N should be acceptable for human vaccination. However, the efficient dosage of hGST-N and the means of administration remain to be investigated. For the second one, since L. lactis is a food-grade LAB and is also acid- and bile-resistant, it might be a good choice as a vehicle for N protein oral vaccination. It was revealed that oral administration of recombinant L. lactis MG1363/pSECN induces significant N-specific antibodies (Fig. 5) and is much more efficient than the oral or intranasal administration of the purified hGST-N, implying that L. lactis is a suitable vehicle for the delivery of N protein to intestinal mucosal sites. Thus, expression of SARS-Cov antigens in L. lactis might provide a novel vaccine. Of course, the immunogenicity of the MG1363/pSECN vaccine is still low. Its CTL response and protective function, including its use as an adjuvant antigen of the SARS-Cov S protein-based mucosal vaccines, remain to be investigated. In summary, we successfully achieved the expression and purification of the SARS-CoV N protein as a fusion with human GST in E. coli; and this hGST-N showed potential as a useful option for the serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV infection. We also constructed a few recombinant L. lactis that expressed the N protein. Oral administration of N-producing L. lactis MG1363 induced N-specific antibodies in mouse sera. These results provide a novel strategy and crucial information for producing the SARS-CoV N protein as a diagnostic antigen and as a mucosal vaccine.
  17 in total

1.  Oral vaccination of mice against tetanus with recombinant Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  K Robinson; L M Chamberlain; K M Schofield; J M Wells; R W Le Page
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Cell wall anchoring of the Streptococcus pyogenes M6 protein in various lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  J C Piard; I Hautefort; V A Fischetti; S D Ehrlich; M Fons; A Gruss
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Food-grade expression of human glutathione S-transferase and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Hua Xiang; Wenzhong Wei; Huarong Tan
Journal:  Biomol Eng       Date:  2003-03

4.  Design of a protein-targeting system for lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Y Dieye; S Usai; F Clier; A Gruss; J C Piard
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of orally administered recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing surface-bound HIV Env.

Authors:  Ke-Qin Xin; Yuka Hoshino; Yoshihiko Toda; Shizunobu Igimi; Yoshitsugu Kojima; Nao Jounai; Kenji Ohba; Akira Kushiro; Mayumi Kiwaki; Kenji Hamajima; Dennis Klinman; Kenji Okuda
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Ability of Lactococcus lactis to export viral capsid antigens: a crucial step for development of live vaccines.

Authors:  Yakhya Dieye; Arjan J W Hoekman; Florence Clier; Vincent Juillard; Hein J Boot; Jean-Christophe Piard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Detection of specific antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus nucleocapsid protein for serodiagnosis of SARS coronavirus pneumonia.

Authors:  Patrick C Y Woo; Susanna K P Lau; Beatrice H L Wong; Hoi-wah Tsoi; Ami M Y Fung; Kwok-hung Chan; Victoria K P Tam; J S Malik Peiris; Kwok-yung Yuen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing.

Authors:  M J Gasson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection.

Authors:  Yi Jun Ruan; Chia Lin Wei; Ai Ling Ee; Vinsensius B Vega; Herve Thoreau; Se Thoe Yun Su; Jer-Ming Chia; Patrick Ng; Kuo Ping Chiu; Landri Lim; Tao Zhang; Chan Kwai Peng; Ean Oon Lynette Lin; Ng Mah Lee; Sin Leo Yee; Lisa F P Ng; Ren Ee Chee; Lawrence W Stanton; Philip M Long; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Induction of SARS-nucleoprotein-specific immune response by use of DNA vaccine.

Authors:  Min-Sheng Zhu; Ying Pan; Hua-Qun Chen; Yue Shen; Xiao-Chun Wang; Yong-Jun Sun; Kai-Hua Tao
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.685

View more
  23 in total

1.  Live bacterial vaccines--a review and identification of potential hazards.

Authors:  Ann Detmer; Jacob Glenting
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 2.  Molecular advances in the cell biology of SARS-CoV and current disease prevention strategies.

Authors:  Caren J Stark; C D Atreya
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 3.  Exploiting virus-like particles as innovative vaccines against emerging viral infections.

Authors:  Hotcherl Jeong; Baik Lin Seong
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.422

Review 4.  Novel vaccine strategies against emerging viruses.

Authors:  Adolfo García-Sastre; Ignacio Mena
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  A Novel Lactococcal Vaccine Expressing a Peptide from the M2 Antigen of H5N2 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A Virus Prolongs Survival of Vaccinated Chickens.

Authors:  Kaleb A Reese; Christopher Lupfer; Rudd C Johnson; Georgi M Mitev; Valerie M Mullen; Bruce L Geller; Manoj Pastey
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2013-05-22

6.  Heterologous expression of Brucella abortus GroEL heat-shock protein in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Anderson Miyoshi; Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán; Luciana A Ribeiro; Yves Le Loir; Sérgio C Oliveira; Philippe Langella; Vasco Azevedo
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 5.328

7.  The protective effect of recombinant Lactococcus lactis oral vaccine on a Clostridium difficile-infected animal model.

Authors:  Xiao-qiang Yang; Ya-gang Zhao; Xue-qing Chen; Bo Jiang; Da-yong Sun
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Oral immunization of a non-recombinant Lactococcus lactis surface displaying influenza hemagglutinin 1 (HA1) induces mucosal immunity in mice.

Authors:  Pui-Fong Jee; Vunjia Tiong; Meng-Hooi Shu; Jing-Jing Khoo; Won Fen Wong; Raha Abdul Rahim; Sazaly AbuBakar; Li-Yen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Nucleocapsid proteins: roles beyond viral RNA packaging.

Authors:  Binbin Ding; Yali Qin; Mingzhou Chen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 9.957

10.  Immunogenicity of a malaria parasite antigen displayed by Lactococcus lactis in oral immunisations.

Authors:  R Ramasamy; S Yasawardena; A Zomer; G Venema; J Kok; K Leenhouts
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.