Literature DB >> 15659890

Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study.

Rajesh Kukreja1, Mihir Desai, Snehal Patel, Sharad Bapat, Mahesh Desai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Bleeding is a major concern during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), especially with the use of multiple tracts. This prospective study aimed to identify factors affecting blood loss during PCNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 236 patients undergoing 301 PCNL procedures at our institute since June 2002. Blood loss was estimated by the postoperative drop in hemoglobin factored by the quantity of any blood transfusion. Various patient-related and intraoperative factors were assessed for association with total blood loss or blood transfusion requirement using stepwise multivariate regression analysis.
RESULTS: The average hemoglobin drop was 1.68 +/- 1.23 g/dL. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed that the occurrence of operative complications (P < 0.0001), mature nephrostomy tract (P < 0.0001), operative time (P < 0.0001), method of access guidance (fluoroscopy v ultrasound) (P = 0.0001), method of tract dilatation (P = 0.0001), multiple (> or =2) tracts (P = 0.003), size of the tract (P = 0.001), renal parenchymal thickness (P = 0.05), and diabetes (P = 0.05) were significant predictors of blood loss. The overall blood transfusion rate for all patients was 7.9%. Preoperative hemoglobin, multiple tracts, stone size, and total blood loss were significant in predicting perioperative blood transfusion requirement. Factors such as age, hypertension, renal insufficiency, urinary infection, the degree of hydronephrosis, stone bulk, and the function of the ipsilateral renal unit did not have any effect on the blood loss. Technical factors such as the operating surgeon and the calix of entry also did not affect the blood loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes, multiple-tract procedures, prolonged operative time, and the occurrence of intraoperative complications are associated with significantly increased blood loss. Atrophic parenchyma and past ipsilateral intervention are associated with reduced blood loss. On the basis of this evidence, maneuvers that may reduce blood loss and transfusion rate include ultrasound-guided access, use of Amplatz or balloon dilatation systems, reducing the operative time, and staging the procedure in cases of a large stone burden or intraoperative complications. Reducing the tract size in pediatric cases, nonhydronephrotic systems and those with a narrow infundibulum, and secondary tracts in a multiple-tract procedure may also reduce blood loss during PCNL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15659890     DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  122 in total

1.  Which factors may effect urinary leakage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ayhan Dirim; Tahsin Turunc; Baris Kuzgunbay; Eray Hasirci; Mehmet Ilteris Tekin; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures.

Authors:  Murat Bagcioglu; Aslan Demir; Hasan Sulhan; Mert Ali Karadag; Mehmet Uslu; Umit Yener Tekdogan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Is standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy still the standard treatment modality for renal stones less than three centimeters?

Authors:  Ömer Sarılar; Faruk Özgör; Onur Küçüktopçu; Burak Uçpınar; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Metin Savun; Zafer Gökhan Gürbüz; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

4.  [Calyceal stones].

Authors:  C Netsch; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cao Dehong; Liu Liangren; Liu Huawei; Wei Qiang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Failure of initial superselective renal arterial embolization in the treatment of renal hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A respective analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Qiqi Mao; Chaojun Wang; Geming Chen; Fuqing Tan; Bohua Shen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Ali Güler; Akif Erbin; Burak Ucpinar; Metin Savun; Omer Sarilar; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Time-dependent oxidative stress effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Haluk Söylemez; Yaşar Bozkurt; Necmettin Penbegül; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Bülent Altunoluk; Murat Atar; Osman Evliyaoglu; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Contemporary practice of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: review of practice in a single region of the UK.

Authors:  Shalom J Srirangam; Richard Darling; Maureen Stopford; Donald Neilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: yes but when? A multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Murat M Rifaioglu; Kadir Onem; Ibrahim Buldu; Tuna Karatag; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.