PURPOSE: Rituximab is an important therapeutic for Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Polymorphisms in FcgammaRIIIA (CD16) receptor expression modulate human immunoglobulin G1 binding and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and may therefore influence responses to rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sequence analysis of the entire coding region of FcgammaRIIIA was undertaken in 58 patients with WM whose outcomes after rituximab were known. RESULTS: Variations in five codons of FcgammaRIIIA were identified. Two were commonly observed (FcgammaRIIIA-48 and FcgammaRIIIA-158) and predicted for amino acid polymorphisms at FcgammaRIIIA-48: leucine/leucine (L/L), leucine/arginine (L/R), and leucine/histidine (L/H). Polymorphisms at FcgammaRIIIA-158 were phenylalanine/phenylalanine (F/F), phenylalanine/valine (F/V), and valine/valine (V/V). A clear linkage between these polymorphisms was detected and all patients with FcgammaRIIIA-158F/F were always FcgammaRIIIA-48L/L, and patients with either FcgammaRIIIA-L/R or -L/H always expressed at least one valine at FcgammaRIIIA-158 (P < or = .001). The response trend was higher for patients with FcgammaRIIIA-48L/H (38.5%) versus -48L/R (25.0%) and LL (22.0%), and was significantly higher for patients with FcgammaRIIIA-158V/V (40.0%) and -V/F (35%) versus -158F/F (9.0%; P = .030). Responses for patients with FcgammaRIIIA-48L/L were higher when at least one valine was present at FcgammaRIIIA-158 (P = .057), thereby supporting a primary role for FcgammaRIIIA-158 polymorphisms in predicting rituximab responses. With a median follow-up of 13 months, no significant differences in the median time to progression and progression-free survival were observed when patients were grouped according to their FcgammaRIIIA-48 and -158 polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: The results of these studies therefore support a predictive role for FcgammaRIIIA-158 polymorphisms and responses to rituximab in WM.
PURPOSE:Rituximab is an important therapeutic for Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Polymorphisms in FcgammaRIIIA (CD16) receptor expression modulate human immunoglobulin G1 binding and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and may therefore influence responses to rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sequence analysis of the entire coding region of FcgammaRIIIA was undertaken in 58 patients with WM whose outcomes after rituximab were known. RESULTS: Variations in five codons of FcgammaRIIIA were identified. Two were commonly observed (FcgammaRIIIA-48 and FcgammaRIIIA-158) and predicted for amino acid polymorphisms at FcgammaRIIIA-48: leucine/leucine (L/L), leucine/arginine (L/R), and leucine/histidine (L/H). Polymorphisms at FcgammaRIIIA-158 were phenylalanine/phenylalanine (F/F), phenylalanine/valine (F/V), and valine/valine (V/V). A clear linkage between these polymorphisms was detected and all patients with FcgammaRIIIA-158F/F were always FcgammaRIIIA-48L/L, and patients with either FcgammaRIIIA-L/R or -L/H always expressed at least one valine at FcgammaRIIIA-158 (P < or = .001). The response trend was higher for patients with FcgammaRIIIA-48L/H (38.5%) versus -48L/R (25.0%) and LL (22.0%), and was significantly higher for patients with FcgammaRIIIA-158V/V (40.0%) and -V/F (35%) versus -158F/F (9.0%; P = .030). Responses for patients with FcgammaRIIIA-48L/L were higher when at least one valine was present at FcgammaRIIIA-158 (P = .057), thereby supporting a primary role for FcgammaRIIIA-158 polymorphisms in predicting rituximab responses. With a median follow-up of 13 months, no significant differences in the median time to progression and progression-free survival were observed when patients were grouped according to their FcgammaRIIIA-48 and -158 polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: The results of these studies therefore support a predictive role for FcgammaRIIIA-158 polymorphisms and responses to rituximab in WM.
Authors: Christopher J Miller; Meritxell Genescà; Kristina Abel; David Montefiori; Donald Forthal; Kristen Bost; Jun Li; David Favre; Joseph M McCune Journal: J Virol Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Jonathan C Sanford; Hong Wu; Yasmina Abdiche; Julie A Harney; Javier Chaparro-Riggers; Karissa Adkins Journal: Immunogenetics Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 2.846
Authors: Rodney J Taylor; Vassiliki Saloura; Ajay Jain; Olga Goloubeva; Stuart Wong; Shari Kronsberg; Madhavi Nagilla; Lorna Silpino; Jonas de Souza; Tanguy Seiwert; Everett Vokes; Victoria Villaflor; Ezra E W Cohen Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Evdoxia Hatjiharissi; Lian Xu; Daniel Ditzel Santos; Zachary R Hunter; Bryan T Ciccarelli; Sigitas Verselis; Michael Modica; Yang Cao; Robert J Manning; Xavier Leleu; Elizabeth A Dimmock; Alexandros Kortsaris; Constantine Mitsiades; Kenneth C Anderson; Edward A Fox; Steven P Treon Journal: Blood Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Sean H Lim; Stephen A Beers; Ruth R French; Peter W M Johnson; Martin J Glennie; Mark S Cragg Journal: Haematologica Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 9.941