Literature DB >> 15659142

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study.

Joseph F Buell1, Lucy Lee, Jill E Martin, Natalie A Dake, Teresa M Cavanaugh, Michael J Hanaway, Pat Weiskittel, Rino Munda, J Wesley Alexander, Michael Cardi, V Ram Peddi, Edward Y Zavala, Elaine Berilla, Marketa Clippard, M Roy First, E Steve Woodle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the quality of life (QoL) and functional recuperation of laproscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) vs. open donor nephrectomy (ODN) donors. This study utilized the SF-36 health survey, single-item health-related quality of life (HRQOL) score, and a functional assessment questionnaire ('Donor Survey').
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 100 LDN and 50 ODN donors. These donors were patients whose procedures were performed at The University Hospital and The Christ Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio.
RESULTS: A total of 46 (46%) LDN and 21 (42%) ODN donors returned the completed surveys. The demographics of the two groups were similar. LDN patients reported a more rapid return to 100% normal health (69 vs. 116 d; p = 0.24), part-time work (21.9 vs. 23.2 d; p = 0.09), and necessitated fewer physician office visits post-operative (2.8 vs. 4.4; p = 0.01). ODN patients reported shorter duration of oral pain medication use (13.4 vs. 7.2 d; p = 0.02). However, a greater number of ODN patients reported post-surgical chronic pain (3 vs. 6; p < 0.05) and hernia (0 vs. 2; p = 0.19). The overall QoL for both groups was comparable with the general USA population.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the decisions of many kidney transplant centers to adopt LDN programs as standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15659142     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00308.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Ten years of laparoscopic living kidney donation. From an extravagant to a routine procedure].

Authors:  M Giessing; T F Fuller; S Deger; J Roigas; M Tüllmann; L Liefeldt; K Budde; T Fischer; B Winkelmann; D Schnorr; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingping Wang; Li Zhu; Xubiao Xie; Haifeng Wang; Hui Yin; Chunhua Fang; Helong Dai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Health care follow-up by live kidney donors more than three yr post-nephrectomy.

Authors:  Francis L Weng; Peter P Reese; Amy D Waterman; Angelo G Soto; Kitaw Demissie; Shamkant Mulgaonkar
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Niels F M Kok; May Y Lind; Birgitta M E Hansson; Desiree Pilzecker; Ingrid R A M Mertens zur Borg; Ben C Knipscheer; Eric J Hazebroek; Ine M Dooper; Willem Weimar; Wim C J Hop; Eddy M M Adang; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Hendrik J Bonjer; Jordanus A van der Vliet; Jan N M IJzermans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-17

5.  Unilateral dependant pulmonary edema during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: report of three cases.

Authors:  Manisha Modi; Veena Shah; Pranjal Modi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08

6.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Are ten cases per year enough to reach the quality standards? A report from a single small-volume transplant center.

Authors:  S Saad; A Paul; J Treckmann; A Tarabichi; M Nagelschmidt; W Arns
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for right kidneys: Experience in a German community hospital.

Authors:  S Saad; A Paul; J Treckmann; M Nagelschmidt; M Heiss; W Arns
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

9.  Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy with a gel-sealed hand-assist access device.

Authors:  Kei Arai; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Noboru Hara; Takashi Kasahara; Kazuhide Saito; Kota Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 10.  Hand-assisted and total laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison.

Authors:  Jonathan Silberstein; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.