Literature DB >> 15657607

Information and informed consent in a longitudinal screening involving children: a questionnaire survey.

Ulrica Gustafsson Stolt1, Gert Helgesson, Per-Erik Liss, Tommy Svensson, Johnny Ludvigsson.   

Abstract

This empirical study explores participants' perceptions of information and understanding of their children's and their own involvement in a longitudinal screening, the ABIS Study. ABIS (All Babies In Southeast Sweden) is a multicentre, longitudinal research screening for Type 1 diabetes and multifactorial diseases involving 17 005 children and their families. For this study, a random selection of mothers was made, using perinatal questionnaire serial numbers from the ABIS study. In total, 293 of these mothers completed an anonymous questionnaire (response rate 73.3%). Our findings from the questionnaire indicate a marked difference between the reported satisfaction with and understanding of the information provided on the one hand and the significant lack of knowledge of some of the aims and methods of the ABIS screening on the other, namely concerning high-risk identification of involved children, potential prevention and future questionnaires. Two questions evoked by our results are: (1) what information is required for participants in longitudinal studies involving children? and (2) how do we ensure and sustain understanding, and thus in a prolonging, informed consent in these studies? This study underlines the importance of an increased understanding of the ethical issues that longitudinal research on children raise and the need to discuss how information and informed consent strategies should be analysed and designed in longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657607     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  12 in total

Review 1.  How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study.

Authors:  G Helgesson; J Ludvigsson; U Gustafsson Stolt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.

Authors:  Omar F Khabour; Mahmoud A Alomari; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 3.  Psychological impact of screening and prediction in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Suzanne Bennett Johnson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Keep people informed or leave them alone? A suggested tool for identifying research participants who rightly want only limited information.

Authors:  S Eriksson; G Helgesson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics and individualizing drug treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  David M Haas
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Comparison of group counseling with individual counseling in the comprehension of informed consent: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Sarkar; Thuppal V Sowmyanarayanan; Prasanna Samuel; Azara S Singh; Anuradha Bose; Jayaprakash Muliyil; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Ulrica Swartling
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort.

Authors:  Midori Yamamoto; Misuzu Fujita; Chisato Mori; Akira Hata
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.

Authors:  Jill Oliver Robinson; Melody J Slashinski; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Ulrica Swartling; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.