Literature DB >> 15657233

Fractional flow reserve for the prediction of cardiac events after coronary stent implantation: results of a multivariate analysis.

V Klauss1, P Erdin, J Rieber, M Leibig, H-U Stempfle, A König, M Baylacher, K Theisen, M C Haufe, G Sroczynski, T Schiele, U Siebert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic value of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements after coronary stent implantation including multiple clinical and angiographic parameters collected in one centre.
METHODS: 119 consecutive patients were enrolled who had a stent implanted with the use of a pressure wire as a guidewire. Patients were followed up for at least six months. Any death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation were considered major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for FFR and covariates.
RESULTS: Complete follow up data were available for all 119 patients. Pre-interventional FFR increased from 0.65 (0.15) to 0.94 (0.06) (p < 0.0001) after stent implantation. Eighteen MACE (15%) occurred during follow up including 15 (12.6%) target vessel revascularisations. Final FFR was significantly higher in patients without than in patients with an event (0.95 (0.05) v 0.88 (0.08), p = 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only final FFR < 0.95 (OR 6.22, 95% CI 1.79 to 21.62, p = 0.004) and reduced left ventricular function (OR 0.95, 95% CI 092 to 0.99, p = 0.021) remained as significant independent predictors for MACE.
CONCLUSION: These results including multiple parameters underline that FFR after coronary stenting is a strong and independent predictor for subsequent cardiac events after six months' follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657233      PMCID: PMC1768692          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.027797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  15 in total

1.  Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; G R Heyndrickx; D Hodeige; R Kirkeeide; K L Gould
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  S C Smith; J T Dove; A K Jacobs; J W Kennedy; D Kereiakes; M J Kern; R E Kuntz; J J Popma; H V Schaff; D O Williams; R J Gibbons; J P Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: a multicenter registry.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Volker Klauss; Uwe Siebert; Eric Powers; Kenji Takazawa; William F Fearon; Javier Escaned; Yukio Tsurumi; Takashi Akasaka; Habib Samady; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic--histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients.

Authors:  J M Isner; J Kishel; K M Kent; J A Ronan; A M Ross; W C Roberts
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Management of restenosis within the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent (the U.S. multicenter experience. The U.S. Palmaz-Schatz Stent Investigators.

Authors:  D S Baim; M J Levine; M B Leon; S Levine; S G Ellis; R A Schatz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis: feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

Authors:  P J Macander; G S Roubin; S K Agrawal; A D Cannon; L S Dean; W A Baxley
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1994-06

7.  Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study).

Authors:  H Mudra; C di Mario; P de Jaegere; H R Figulla; C Macaya; R Zahn; B Wennerblom; W Rutsch; V Voudris; E Regar; K H Henneke; V Schächinger; A Zeiher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Predictors of diffuse-type in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  S G Lee; C W Lee; M K Hong; H K Park; J J Kim; S W Park; S J Park
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but "Normal" coronary angiography.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; F Hersbach; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; J W Bech; G R Heyndrickx; K L Gould; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  N H Pijls; J A van Son; R L Kirkeeide; B De Bruyne; K L Gould
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  5 in total

1.  Utility of myocardial fractional flow reserve for prediction of restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Hideshi Ishii; Toru Kataoka; Yoshiki Kobayashi; Takara Tsumori; Hiroaki Takeshita; Ryo Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Shirai; Hiroki Nishioka; Takao Hasegawa; Shinji Nakata; Yoshihisa Shimada; Shoichi Ehara; Takashi Muro; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki; Shozo Kusachi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-11

3.  A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Authors:  Damien Collison; John D McClure; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Invasive and non-invasive fractional flow reserve index in validation of hemodynamic severity of intracoronary lesions.

Authors:  Jarosław Wasilewski; Kryspin Mirota; Michał Hawranek; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  Visualization of the improvement of myocardial perfusion after coronary intervention using motorized fractional flow reserve pullback curve.

Authors:  Akiko Matsuo; Satoshi Shimoo; Kazuaki Takamatsu; Yumika Tsuji; Atsushi Kyodo; Kayoko Mera; Masahiro Koide; Koji Isodono; Yoshinori Tsubakimoto; Tomohiko Sakatani; Keiji Inoue; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2016-12-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.