Literature DB >> 15656730

Effects of backward speech and speaker variability in language discrimination by rats.

Juan M Toro1, Josep B Trobalon, Núria Sebastián-Gallés.   

Abstract

Human infants use prosodic cues present in speech to extract language regularities, and it has been suggested that this capacity is anchored in more general mechanisms that are shared across mammals. This study explores the extent to which rats can generalize prosodic cues that have been extracted from a training corpus to new sentences and how this discrimination process is affected by the normalization of the sentences when multiple speakers are introduced. Conditions 1 and 2 show rats' abilities to use prosodic cues present in speech, allowing them to discriminate between sentences not previously heard. But this discrimination is not possible when sentences are played backward. Conditions 3 and 4 show that language discrimination by rats is also taxed by the process of speaker normalization. These findings have remarkable parallels with data from human adults, human newborns, and cotton-top tamarins. Implications for speech perception by humans are discussed. Copyright 2005 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15656730     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  15 in total

1.  Breaking butterflies on a wheel.

Authors:  P McCrory
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Conceptual representations in goal-directed decision making.

Authors:  Nicholas Shea; Kristine Krug; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Zebra finches are sensitive to prosodic features of human speech.

Authors:  Michelle J Spierings; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats.

Authors:  Owen R Floody; Ladislav Ouda; Benjamin A Porter; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-24

6.  Responses of inferior collicular cells to species-specific vocalizations in normal and enucleated rats.

Authors:  T A Pincherli Castellanos; J Aitoubah; S Molotchnikoff; F Lepore; J-P Guillemot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Critical period for acoustic preference in mice.

Authors:  Eun-Jin Yang; Eric W Lin; Takao K Hensch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Discrimination of auditory stimuli during isoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Manuel J Rojas; Jinna A Navas; Stephen A Greene; David M Rector
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  The human infant brain: A neural architecture able to learn language.

Authors:  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-02

10.  Prosody discrimination by songbirds (Padda oryzivora).

Authors:  Nozomi Naoi; Shigeru Watanabe; Kikuo Maekawa; Junko Hibiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.