Literature DB >> 15655169

Functional recovery after facial and sciatic nerve crush injury in the rat.

Tessa A Hadlock1, James Heaton, Mack Cheney, Susan E Mackinnon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically record rat facial nerve recovery following crush injury to the main trunk with respect to ocular and vibrissial function and to compare the rates of facial and sciatic nerve recovery from crush injury in the same animals. This serves as a means of validating the functional parameters of facial nerve recovery against the well-known measure of hind limb function, the Sciatic Function Index.
METHODS: The main trunk of the facial nerve and the proximal segment of the sciatic nerve were exposed in all animals. Both nerves were subjected to standardized crush injury and subsequent daily functional testing. After a plateau of functional recovery was achieved, the animals were killed, and the distances between the sites of injury and the end musculature were measured, which allowed determination and comparison of recovery rates in both systems.
RESULTS: All crush injuries resulted in loss of electrical conductivity, as proven by intraoperative proximal nerve stimulation. Recovery of ocular and vibrissial motor function occurred starting at postoperative day (POD) 9 and continuing through POD 20. Hind limb function returned later (POD 14-34); however, when corrected for distance, the sciatic recovery rate (2.26 mm/d) appeared to match that of the facial nerve (1.5-2.4 mm/d).
CONCLUSIONS: Recovery after facial nerve crush injury follows a predictable time course, and the rate of recovery is consistent with that of sciatic nerve injury. Return of the blink reflex, loss of vibrissial fibrillations, and return of vibrissial sweeping function appear to be internally consistent functional measures of facial recovery. These quantitative measures will be useful for future facial nerve manipulation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15655169     DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.7.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  19 in total

1.  A novel method of head fixation for the study of rodent facial function.

Authors:  Tessa Hadlock; Jeffrey Kowaleski; Susan Mackinnon; James T Heaton
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Electrophysiological assessment of a peptide amphiphile nanofiber nerve graft for facial nerve repair.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Greene; Mark T McClendon; Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Zaida Álvarez; Samuel I Stupp; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Long-term functional recovery after facial nerve transection and repair in the rat.

Authors:  Caroline A Banks; Christopher Knox; Daniel A Hunter; Susan E Mackinnon; Marc H Hohman; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.873

4.  The Cofilin/Limk1 Pathway Controls the Growth Rate of Both Developing and Regenerating Motor Axons.

Authors:  Michele E Frendo; Alexandra da Silva; Keith D Phan; Soizic Riche; Samantha J Butler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Rat whisker movement after facial nerve lesion: evidence for autonomic contraction of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Shu Hsien Sheu; Marc H Hohman; Christopher J Knox; Julie S Weinberg; Ingrid J Kleiss; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  The convergence of facial nerve branches providing whisker pad motor supply in rats: implications for facial reanimation study.

Authors:  Doug Henstrom; Tessa Hadlock; Robin Lindsay; Christopher J Knox; Juan Malo; Kalpesh T Vakharia; James T Heaton
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  A model for functional recovery and cortical reintegration after hemifacial composite tissue allotransplantation.

Authors:  Kia M Washington; Mario G Solari; Justin M Sacks; Elaine K Horibe; Jignesh V Unadkat; George E Carvell; Daniel J Simons; W P Andrew Lee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Evidence for facial nerve-independent mechanisms of blinking in the rat.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Jeffrey Kowaleski; Colin Edwards; Christopher Smitson; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Reinnervation of the tibialis anterior following sciatic nerve crush injury: a confocal microscopic study in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Christina K Magill; Alice Tong; David Kawamura; Ayato Hayashi; Daniel A Hunter; Alexander Parsadanian; Susan E Mackinnon; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Rodent facial nerve recovery after selected lesions and repair techniques.

Authors:  Tessa A Hadlock; Jeffrey Kowaleski; David Lo; Susan E Mackinnon; James T Heaton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.