Literature DB >> 15654586

Modulation of intracortical excitability in human hand motor areas. The effect of cutaneous stimulation and its topographical arrangement.

M C Ridding1, S L Pearce, S C Flavel.   

Abstract

Changes in afferent input can alter the excitability of intracortical inhibitory systems. For example, using paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), both electrical digital stimulation and muscle vibration have been shown to reduce short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). The effects following muscle vibration are confined to the corticospinal projection to the vibrated muscles. The results following digital stimulation are less clear and the relative timing of the cutaneous stimulation and TMS is critical. Here we investigated further whether changes in SICI following digit stimulation exhibit topographic specificity. Eleven normal subjects were investigated (age 28.2+/-7.5 years, mean+/-SD). Electromyographic recordings were made from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles. SICI was measured, with and without preceding electrical digit II or digit V cutaneous stimulation. The interval between the digital nerve stimulus and test magnetic stimulus was independently set for each subject and established by subtracting the onset latency of the motor evoked potential (MEP) from the latency of the E2 component of the cutaneomuscular reflex. Therefore, measures of intracortical excitability were made at a time at which it is known that cutaneous input is capable of modulating cortical excitability. Single digital nerve stimuli applied to digit II significantly reduced SICI in FDI but not in ADM. Single digital nerve stimuli applied to digit V significantly reduced SICI in ADM but not in FDI or APB. There was a more generalised effect on intracortical facilitation (ICF) with both digit II and digit V stimulation significantly increasing ICF in FDI and ADM. Digital stimulation (either DII or DV) did not significantly affect SICI/ICF in APB. These findings show that appropriately timed cutaneous stimuli are capable of modulating SICI in a topographically specific manner. We suggest that the selective decrease in SICI seen with cutaneous stimulation may be important for focusing of muscle activation during motor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654586     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2176-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cutaneomotor integration in human hand motor areas: somatotopic effect and interaction of afferents.

Authors:  S Tamburin; P Manganotti; G Zanette; A Fiaschi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Focal reduction of intracortical inhibition in the motor cortex by selective proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; Alessandra Pesenti; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modulation of intracortical neuronal circuits in human hand motor area by digit stimulation.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Jane Ng; Hugo Théoret; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of digital nerve stimuli on responses to electrical or magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  A Maertens de Noordhout; J C Rothwell; B L Day; D Dressler; K Nakashima; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cutaneous reflexes in small muscles of the hand.

Authors:  M R Caccia; A J McComas; A R Upton; T Blogg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Impaired modulation of intracortical inhibition in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-03-28       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  U Ziemann; S Lönnecker; B J Steinhoff; W Paulus
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Differential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective activation of an intrinsic hand muscle.

Authors:  Maryam Zoghi; Sophie L Pearce; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sensorimotor integration to cutaneous afferents in humans: the effect of the size of the receptive field.

Authors:  Stefano Tamburin; Antonio Fiaschi; Annalisa Andreoli; Silvia Marani; Giampietro Zanette
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans.

Authors:  R C G Helmich; T Bäumer; H R Siebner; B R Bloem; A Münchau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulation of intracortical facilitatory circuits of the human primary motor cortex by digital nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Simone Zittel; Tobias Bäumer; Joachim Liepert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Location-specific cutaneous electrical stimulation of the footsole modulates corticospinal excitability to the plantarflexors and dorsiflexors during standing.

Authors:  Gagan Gill; Davis A Forman; Joanna E Reeves; Janet L Taylor; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-07

5.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke.

Authors:  Pablo Celnik; Nam-Jong Paik; Yves Vandermeeren; Michael Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Deficient intracortical inhibition (SICI) during movement preparation after chronic stroke.

Authors:  F C Hummel; B Steven; J Hoppe; K Heise; G Thomalla; L G Cohen; C Gerloff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Shota Miyaguchi; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hiroshi Shirozu; Shigeki Kameyama
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Improvement of Upper Extremity Deficit after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Combined with and without Preconditioning Stimulation Using Dual-hemisphere Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Peripheral Neuromuscular Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Takashi Takebayashi; Kayoko Takahashi; Misa Moriwaki; Tomosaburo Sakamoto; Kazuhisa Domen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.