Literature DB >> 16078031

Sensorimotor integration to cutaneous afferents in humans: the effect of the size of the receptive field.

Stefano Tamburin1, Antonio Fiaschi, Annalisa Andreoli, Silvia Marani, Giampietro Zanette.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to study sensorimotor integration in humans non-invasively. Motor excitability has been found to be inhibited when afferent stimuli are given to a peripheral nerve and precede TMS at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 20-50 ms. This phenomenon has been referred to as short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). To better understand the functional meaning of these phenomena, we examined the effect of the size of the receptive field on SAI to cutaneous afferents in upper-limb sensorimotor areas in humans. We examined the effect of the stimulation of the isolated right first (D1), second (D2) and third finger (D3), the right second and third finger together (D23) and the right first three fingers together (D123) on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to TMS in hand and forearm muscles. We examined the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles. Digital stimulation preceded TMS at ISIs of 20-50 ms. The effect of D2 stimulation was MEP inhibition (SAI), which was more marked and consistent in APB and FDI muscles than in ECR and FCR muscles. Similarly, D1 and D3 stimulation caused MEP reduction, while no MEP enhancement could be found to single finger stimulation. In contrast, D123 stimulation induced less effective SAI in upper-limb muscles. MEP potentiation was recorded in some muscles to D123 stimulation. A significant difference between D2 and D123 stimulation was found in APB (ISIs = 30-50 ms) and FDI (ISIs = 40-50 ms) muscles, but not in forearm muscles. The effect to D23stimulation on MEP amplitude was intermediate between those to D2 and D123 stimulation. Our data suggest that motor excitability to cutaneous afferents may be influenced by the size of the receptive fields, this effect being the result of increasing convergence between hand afferents in the somatosensory system. These phenomena appear to be topographically arranged across the representation of upper-limb muscles. These findings may help to understand the functional significance of SAI in normal physiology and pathophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16078031     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0041-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Cutaneomotor integration in human hand motor areas: somatotopic effect and interaction of afferents.

Authors:  S Tamburin; P Manganotti; G Zanette; A Fiaschi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Finger somatotopy in human motor cortex.

Authors:  R Beisteiner; C Windischberger; R Lanzenberger; V Edward; R Cunnington; M Erdler; A Gartus; B Streibl; E Moser; L Deecke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  How might the motor cortex individuate movements?

Authors:  M H Schieber
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man.

Authors:  B L Day; H Riescher; A Struppler; J C Rothwell; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effects of lorazepam on short latency afferent inhibition and short latency intracortical inhibition in humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; E Saturno; M Dileone; F Pilato; R Nardone; F Ranieri; G Musumeci; T Fiorilla; P Tonali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Modulation of motor activity by cutaneous input: inhibition of the magnetic motor evoked potential by digital electrical stimulation.

Authors:  P D Clouston; L Kiers; D Menkes; H Sander; K Chiappa; D Cros
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04

7.  The effects upon the activity of hand and forearm muscles of intracortical stimulation in the vicinity of corticomotor neurones in the conscious monkey.

Authors:  R N Lemon; R B Muir; G W Mantel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Convergence in the somatosensory pathway between cutaneous afferents from the index and middle fingers in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D Burke; B B McKeon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long-latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P D Cheney; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: input-output relations.

Authors:  I Rosén; H Asanuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cortical excitability following passive movement.

Authors:  Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Surround inhibition in the motor system.

Authors:  Sandra Beck; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Orlando B Swayne; Yves Vandermeeren; Mickael Camus; Michael A Dimyan; Michelle Harris-Love; Monica A Perez; Patrick Ragert; John C Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Shota Miyaguchi; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hiroshi Shirozu; Shigeki Kameyama
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Modulation of short-latency afferent inhibition depends on digit and task-relevance.

Authors:  Michael J Asmussen; Christopher M Zapallow; Mark F Jacobs; Kevin G H Lee; Philemon Tsang; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sensorimotor integration within the primary motor cortex by selective nerve fascicle stimulation.

Authors:  Federico Ranieri; Giovanni Pellegrino; Anna Lisa Ciancio; Gabriella Musumeci; Emiliano Noce; Angelo Insola; Lorenzo Alirio Diaz Balzani; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Giovanni Di Pino
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.228

8.  Short-latency afferent inhibition modulation during finger movement.

Authors:  Michael J Asmussen; Mark F Jacobs; Kevin G H Lee; Christopher M Zapallow; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability.

Authors:  Masaki Nakagawa; Ryoki Sasaki; Shota Tsuiki; Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.