Y Nagahama1, T Okina, N Suzuki, H Nabatame, M Matsuda. 1. Department of Geriatric Neurology, Shiga Medical Center, Moriyama-city, Shiga 524-8524, Japan. nagahama@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the neural substrates corresponding to the perseverative errors in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). METHODS: The study examined the correlations between the WCST performances and the SPECT measurements of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in subjects with neurodegenerative dementia. Negative non-linear correlations between the rCBF and the two different types of the perseverative errors ("stuck-in-set" and "recurrent" perseverative errors) were calculated on a voxel basis and volume-of-interest basis in the mixed groups of 72 elderly and dementia patients. RESULTS: The stuck-in-set perseverative error was associated with the reduced rCBF in the rostrodorsal prefrontal cortex, whereas the recurrent perseverative error was related to the left parietal activity but not to the prefrontal activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings augment evidence that the rostrodorsal prefrontal cortex crucially mediates attentional set shifting, and suggest that the stuck-in-set perseverative errors would be a true pathognomonic sign of frontal dysfunction. Moreover, this study shows that the recurrent perseverative errors may not be associated closely with the prefrontal function, suggesting that this error and the stuck-in-set error should be differentially estimated in the WCST.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the neural substrates corresponding to the perseverative errors in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). METHODS: The study examined the correlations between the WCST performances and the SPECT measurements of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in subjects with neurodegenerative dementia. Negative non-linear correlations between the rCBF and the two different types of the perseverative errors ("stuck-in-set" and "recurrent" perseverative errors) were calculated on a voxel basis and volume-of-interest basis in the mixed groups of 72 elderly and dementiapatients. RESULTS: The stuck-in-set perseverative error was associated with the reduced rCBF in the rostrodorsal prefrontal cortex, whereas the recurrent perseverative error was related to the left parietal activity but not to the prefrontal activity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings augment evidence that the rostrodorsal prefrontal cortex crucially mediates attentional set shifting, and suggest that the stuck-in-set perseverative errors would be a true pathognomonic sign of frontal dysfunction. Moreover, this study shows that the recurrent perseverative errors may not be associated closely with the prefrontal function, suggesting that this error and the stuck-in-set error should be differentially estimated in the WCST.
Authors: K Rubia; T Russell; S Overmeyer; M J Brammer; E T Bullmore; T Sharma; A Simmons; S C Williams; V Giampietro; C M Andrew; E Taylor Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: D T Stuss; B Levine; M P Alexander; J Hong; C Palumbo; L Hamer; K J Murphy; D Izukawa Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2000 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: A L Bokde; P Pietrini; V Ibáñez; M L Furey; G E Alexander; N R Graff-Radford; S I Rapoport; M B Schapiro; B Horwitz Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2001-03
Authors: Y Nagahama; T Okada; Y Katsumi; T Hayashi; H Yamauchi; C Oyanagi; J Konishi; H Fukuyama; H Shibasaki Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: S Y Bookheimer; M H Strojwas; M S Cohen; A M Saunders; M A Pericak-Vance; J C Mazziotta; G W Small Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier; Mary M Machulda; Hugo Botha; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David S Knopman; Val J Lowe; Julie A Fields; Nikki H Stricker; Bradley F Boeve; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; David T Jones Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 6.682
Authors: Valerie B Thompson; Justin Heiman; James B Chambers; Stephen C Benoit; William R Buesing; Mantana K Norman; Andrew B Norman; Jack W Lipton Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2008-12-31
Authors: Nick P Lao-Kaim; Leon Fonville; Vincent P Giampietro; Steven C R Williams; Andrew Simmons; Kate Tchanturia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 3.240