Literature DB >> 15652691

Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature.

Melissa L Finucane1, Joan L Holup.   

Abstract

The rapid globalization of the world economy has increased the need for an astute understanding of cultural differences in perceptions, values, and ways of thinking about new food technologies. In this paper, we describe how socio-psychological and cultural factors may affect public perceptions of the risk of genetically modified (GM) food. We present psychological, sociological, and anthropological research on risk perception as a framework for understanding cross-national differences in reactions to GM food. Differences in the cultural values and circumstances of people in the US, European countries, and the developing world are examined. The implications of cultural theory for risk communication and decision making about GM food are discussed and directions for future research highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652691     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  Interpreting evidence: why values can matter as much as science.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Attitudes of Agricultural Experts Toward Genetically Modified Crops: A Case Study in Southwest Iran.

Authors:  Mansour Ghanian; Omid M Ghoochani; Miranda Kitterlin; Sheida Jahangiry; Kiumars Zarafshani; Steven Van Passel; Hossein Azadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Scientific dissent and public policy. Is targeting dissent a reasonable way to protect sound policy decisions?

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Authors:  Laura Maxim; Mario Mazzocchi; Stephan Van den Broucke; Fabiana Zollo; Tobin Robinson; Claire Rogers; Domagoj Vrbos; Giorgia Zamariola; Anthony Smith
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Home birth and barriers to referring women with obstetric complications to hospitals: a mixed-methods study in Zahedan, southeastern Iran.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ghazi Tabatabaie; Zahra Moudi; AbouAli Vedadhir
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.

Authors:  Jan M Lucht
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 7.  Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research.

Authors:  Anja Leppin; Arja R Aro
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-02-12

8.  When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies.

Authors:  Aisha Egolf; Christina Hartmann; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.

Authors:  Sumran Ali; Muhammad Asim Nawaz; Muhammad Ghufran; Sumaira Nazar Hussain; Aljaifi Saddam Hussein Mohammed
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

10.  The predictors of glucose screening: the contribution of risk perception.

Authors:  Pilar Lavielle; Niels Wacher
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.