Literature DB >> 15651072

Role of community risk factors and resources on breast carcinoma stage at diagnosis.

Pamela L Davidson1, Roshan Bastani, Terry T Nakazono, Daisy C Carreon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study investigated the individual and community determinants of breast carcinoma stage at diagnosis (BCSAD) using multiple data sources merged with cancer registry data. The literature review yielded 5 studies that analyzed cancer registry data merged with community-level variables (1995-2004).
METHODS: Community variables constructed for the current study reflected social and economic risk factors, physician supply, and health maintenance organization penetration. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the significant predictors of increasingly progressive BCSAD.
RESULTS: Disparities remained for black and Hispanic females in California, who were least likely to be diagnosed early compared with their white counterparts. Younger (< 40 years) and middle-aged (40-64 years) females were less likely to be diagnosed with early BCSAD, compared with older females (> or = 65 years). Utilizing services at hospitals serving a lower volume of patients with breast carcinoma was associated with later BCSAD. After controlling for individual-level factors, community-level variables constructed at the census block group and county level were tested. If a woman resided in a neighborhood with greater percentages of female-headed households, persons living below the poverty level, less educated people, and more recent immigrants, then her chances of being diagnosed at an earlier stage were diminished. If, conversely, she resided in a neighborhood with greater percentages of females > or = 65 years (a proxy for Medicare coverage), her access to medical care and the probability of earlier BCSAD increased. County-level insurance rates and residing in counties where greater percentages of women ever had a mammogram were associated with in situ and early-stage diagnosis. Similarly, the supply of primary care physicians and radiologists was associated positively with earlier BCSAD.
CONCLUSIONS: Results confirmed community-level predictors of socioeconomic and delivery system context matter, although the individual-level predictors showed a stronger effect. Nevertheless, analysis of community variables is promising for guiding and evaluating the effects of health policy and developing community and delivery system interventions for earlier detection and treatment of breast carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15651072     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  21 in total

1.  Associations of physician supplies with colon cancer care in Ontario and California, 1996 to 2006.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Karen Y Fung; Eric J Holowaty; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Madhan K Balagurusamy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  The supply of physicians and care for breast cancer in Ontario and California, 1998 to 2006.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Caroline Hamm; Madhan Balagurusamy; Eric J Holowaty
Journal:  Can J Rural Med       Date:  2011

Review 4.  The impact of neighborhood social and built environment factors across the cancer continuum: Current research, methodological considerations, and future directions.

Authors:  Scarlett Lin Gomez; Salma Shariff-Marco; Mindy DeRouen; Theresa H M Keegan; Irene H Yen; Mahasin Mujahid; William A Satariano; Sally L Glaser
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Neighborhood deprivation and clinical outcomes among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Lorraine R Reitzel; Nga Nguyen; Mark E Zafereo; Guojun Li; Qingyi Wei; Erich M Sturgis
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  Leveraging an Implementation Science Framework to Adapt and Scale a Patient Navigator Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening Outreach in a New Community.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Catherine A O'Brian; Jacqueline M Kanoon; Alnierys Venegas; Stacy Ignoffo; Charlotte Picard; Kristi L Allgood; Laura Tom; Helen Margellos-Anast
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Primary care physician supply, insurance type, and late-stage cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ren Chen; Kymia M Love-Jackson; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kate J Fisher; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Surveillance mammography for Medicaid/Medicare breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Patricia Carcaise-Edinboro; Cathy J Bradley; Bassam Dahman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.