Literature DB >> 15650589

Electron paramagnetic resonance and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based investigations of individual doses for persons living at Metlino in the upper reaches of the Techa River.

Marina O Degteva1, Lynn R Anspaugh, Alexander V Akleyev, Peter Jacob, Denis V Ivanov, Albrecht Wieser, Marina I Vorobiova, Elena A Shishkina, Valentina A Shved, Alexandra Vozilova, Sergey N Bayankin, Bruce A Napier.   

Abstract

Waterborne releases to the Techa River from the Mayak Production Association in Russia during 1949-1956 resulted in significant doses to persons living downstream; the most contaminated village was Metlino, about 7 km from the site of release. Internal and external doses have been estimated for these residents using the Techa River Dosimetry System-2000 (TRDS-2000); the primary purpose is to support epidemiological studies of the members of the Extended Techa River Cohort. Efforts to validate the calculations of external and internal dose are considered essential. One validation study of the TRDS-2000 system has been performed by the comparison of calculated doses to quartz from bricks in old buildings at Metlino with those measured by luminescence dosimetry. Two additional methods of validation considered here are electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of teeth and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) measurements of chromosome translocations in circulating lymphocytes. For electron paramagnetic resonance, 36 measurements on 26 teeth from 16 donors from Metlino were made at the GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health (16 measurements) and the Institute of Metal Physics (20 measurements); the correlation among measurements made at the two laboratories has been found to be 0.99. Background measurements were also made on 218 teeth (63 molars, 128 premolars, and 27 incisors). Fluorescence in situ hybridization measurements were made for 31 residents of Metlino. These measurements were handicapped by the analysis of a limited number of cells; for several individuals no stable translocations were observed. Fluorescence in situ hybridization measurements were also made for 39 individuals believed to be unexposed. The EPR- and FISH-based estimates agreed well for permanent residents of Metlino: 0.67 +/- 0.21 Gy and 0.48 +/- 0.18 Gy (mean +/- standard error of the mean), respectively. Results of the two experimental methods also agreed well with the estimates derived from the use of the TRDS-2000. For all persons investigated according to each technique, the EPR-measured dose to enamel was 0.55 +/- 0.17 Gy, and the TRDS-2000 prediction for the dose to enamel for these individuals is 0.55 +/- 0.07 Gy. The fluorescence in situ hybridization-based dose, 0.38 +/- 0.10 Gy, compared well to the TRDS-2000 prediction of external dose, 0.31 +/- 0.03 Gy, to red bone marrow for these persons. Validation of external doses at the remaining villages is an active area of investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650589     DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000146612.69488.9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of anthropogenic dose distribution amongst building walls at the Metlino area of the upper Techa River region.

Authors:  Marina O Degteva; Nickolay G Bougrov; Marina I Vorobiova; Peter Jacob; H Yeter Göksu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Concentrations of 90Sr in the tooth tissues 60 years after intake: results of TL measurements and applications for Techa River dosimetry.

Authors:  E A Shishkina; E I Tolstykh; E Verdi; A Yu Volchkova; I Veronese; N A El-Faramawy; H Y Göksu; M O Degteva
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Analysis of EPR and FISH studies of radiation doses in persons who lived in the upper reaches of the Techa River.

Authors:  M O Degteva; N B Shagina; E A Shishkina; A V Vozilova; A Y Volchkova; M I Vorobiova; A Wieser; P Fattibene; S Della Monaca; E Ainsbury; J Moquet; L R Anspaugh; B A Napier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents.

Authors:  E A Shishkina; A Yu Volchkova; Y S Timofeev; P Fattibene; A Wieser; D V Ivanov; V A Krivoschapov; V I Zalyapin; S Della Monaca; V De Coste; M O Degteva; L R Anspaugh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Local bone-marrow exposure: how to interpret the data on stable chromosome aberrations in circulating lymphocytes? (some comments on the use of FISH method for dose reconstruction for Techa riverside Residents).

Authors:  Evgenia I Tolstykh; Marina O Degteva; Alexandra V Vozilova; Lynn R Anspaugh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.