Literature DB >> 26205380

Analysis of EPR and FISH studies of radiation doses in persons who lived in the upper reaches of the Techa River.

M O Degteva1, N B Shagina2, E A Shishkina3, A V Vozilova2, A Y Volchkova2, M I Vorobiova2, A Wieser4, P Fattibene5, S Della Monaca5, E Ainsbury6, J Moquet6, L R Anspaugh7, B A Napier8.   

Abstract

Waterborne radioactive releases into the Techa River from the Mayak Production Association in Russia during 1949-1956 resulted in significant doses to about 30,000 persons who lived in downstream settlements. The residents were exposed to internal and external radiation. Two methods for reconstruction of the external dose are considered in this paper, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of teeth, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) measurements of chromosome translocations in circulating lymphocytes. The main issue in the application of the EPR and FISH methods for reconstruction of the external dose for the Techa Riverside residents was strontium radioisotopes incorporated in teeth and bones that act as a source of confounding local exposures. In order to estimate and subtract doses from incorporated (89,90)Sr, the EPR and FISH assays were supported by measurements of (90)Sr-body burdens and estimates of (90)Sr concentrations in dental tissues by the luminescence method. The resulting dose estimates derived from EPR to FISH measurements for residents of the upper Techa River were found to be consistent: The mean values vary from 510 to 550 mGy for the villages located close to the site of radioactive release to 130-160 mGy for the more distant villages. The upper bound of individual estimates for both methods is equal to 2.2-2.3 Gy. The EPR- and FISH-based dose estimates were compared with the doses calculated for the donors using the most recent Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS). The TRDS external dose assessments are based on the data on contamination of the Techa River floodplain, simulation of air kerma above the contaminated soil, age-dependent lifestyles and individual residence histories. For correct comparison, TRDS-based doses were calculated from two sources: external exposure from the contaminated environment and internal exposure from (137)Cs incorporated in donors' soft tissues. It is shown here that the TRDS-based absorbed doses in tooth enamel and muscle are in agreement with EPR- and FISH-based estimates within uncertainty bounds. Basically, this agreement between the estimates has confirmed the validity of external doses calculated with the TRDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose reconstruction; Electron paramagnetic resonance; Environmental contamination; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Techa River

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26205380     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-015-0611-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  23 in total

1.  External exposure to radionuclides accumulated in shoreline sediments with an application to the lower Clinch River.

Authors:  A I Apostoaei; S K Nair; B A Thomas; C J Lewis; F O Hoffman; K M Thiessen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Preliminary uncertainty analysis for the doses estimated using the Techa River dosimetry system--2000.

Authors:  B A Napier; N B Shagina; M O Degteva; E I Tolstykh; M I Vorobiova; L R Anspaugh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Thin layer alpha-Al2O3:C beta dosemeters for the assessment of current dose rate in teeth due to 90Sr intake, and comparison with electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry.

Authors:  H Y Göksu; N Semiochkina; E A Shiskina; A Wieser; N A El-Faramawy; M O Degteva; P Jacob; D V Ivanov
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel: A review.

Authors:  Paola Fattibene; Freddy Callens
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  How much can we say about site-specific cancer radiation risks?

Authors:  D L Preston; L Yu Krestinina; M E Sokolnikov; E Ron; F G Davis; E V Ostroumova; E S Gilbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Concentrations of 90Sr in the tooth tissues 60 years after intake: results of TL measurements and applications for Techa River dosimetry.

Authors:  E A Shishkina; E I Tolstykh; E Verdi; A Yu Volchkova; I Veronese; N A El-Faramawy; H Y Göksu; M O Degteva
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  FISH-based analysis of stable translocations in a Techa River population.

Authors:  M Bauchinger; K Salassidis; H Braselmann; A Vozilova; S Pressl; G Stephan; G Snigiryova; V P Kozheurov; A Akleyev
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Pilot study of the Urals population by tooth electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry.

Authors:  A A Romanyukha; M O Degteva; V P Kozheurov; A Wieser; P Jacob; E A Ignatiev; M I Vorobiova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Mina Ha; Michael Hauptmann; Parveen Bhatti; Radim J Sram; Olena Beskid; E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Carita Lindholm; Mimako Nakano; Yoshiaki Kodama; Nori Nakamura; Irena Vorobtsova; Ursula Oestreicher; Günther Stephan; Lee C Yong; Manfred Bauchinger; Ernst Schmid; Hai Won Chung; Firouz Darroudi; Laurence Roy; Phillipe Voisin; Joan F Barquinero; Gordon Livingston; David Blakey; Isamu Hayata; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Wang; L Michelle Bennett; L Gayle Littlefield; Alan A Edwards; Ruth A Kleinerman; James D Tucker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Reconstruction of the contamination of the Techa River in 1949-1951 as a result of releases from the "Mayak" Production Association.

Authors:  N B Shagina; M I Vorobiova; M O Degteva; L M Peremyslova; E A Shishkina; L R Anspaugh; B A Napier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.925

View more
  7 in total

1.  External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents.

Authors:  E A Shishkina; A Yu Volchkova; Y S Timofeev; P Fattibene; A Wieser; D V Ivanov; V A Krivoschapov; V I Zalyapin; S Della Monaca; V De Coste; M O Degteva; L R Anspaugh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  External dose reconstruction for the former village of Metlino (Techa River, Russia) based on environmental surveys, luminescence measurements, and radiation transport modelling.

Authors:  M M Hiller; C Woda; N G Bougrov; M O Degteva; O Ivanov; A Ulanovsky; S Romanov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Local bone-marrow exposure: how to interpret the data on stable chromosome aberrations in circulating lymphocytes? (some comments on the use of FISH method for dose reconstruction for Techa riverside Residents).

Authors:  Evgenia I Tolstykh; Marina O Degteva; Alexandra V Vozilova; Lynn R Anspaugh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Electron spin resonance (ESR) dose measurement in bone of Hiroshima A-bomb victim.

Authors:  Angela Kinoshita; Oswaldo Baffa; Sérgio Mascarenhas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dose Estimation for Exposure to Radioactive Fallout from Nuclear Detonations.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Harold L Beck; Lynn R Anspaugh; Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; Sergey Shinkarev
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 7.  Eurados review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for internal exposures to ionising radiation and their applications.

Authors:  A Giussani; M A Lopez; H Romm; A Testa; E A Ainsbury; M Degteva; S Della Monaca; G Etherington; P Fattibene; I Güclu; A Jaworska; D C Lloyd; I Malátová; S McComish; D Melo; J Osko; A Rojo; S Roch-Lefevre; L Roy; E Shishkina; N Sotnik; S Y Tolmachev; A Wieser; C Woda; M Youngman
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 1.925

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.