Literature DB >> 15649878

Independent metabolic costs of supporting body weight and accelerating body mass during walking.

Alena Grabowski1, Claire T Farley, Rodger Kram.   

Abstract

The metabolic cost of walking is determined by many mechanical tasks, but the individual contribution of each task remains unclear. We hypothesized that the force generated to support body weight and the work performed to redirect and accelerate body mass each individually incur a significant metabolic cost during normal walking. To test our hypothesis, we measured changes in metabolic rate in response to combinations of simulated reduced gravity and added loading. We found that reducing body weight by simulating reduced gravity modestly decreased net metabolic rate. By calculating the metabolic cost per Newton of reduced body weight, we deduced that generating force to support body weight comprises approximately 28% of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Similar to previous loading studies, we found that adding both weight and mass increased net metabolic rate in more than direct proportion to load. However, when we added mass alone by using a combination of simulated reduced gravity and added load, net metabolic rate increased about one-half as much as when we added both weight and mass. By calculating the cost per kilogram of added mass, we deduced that the work performed on the center of mass comprises approximately 45% of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Our findings support the hypothesis that force and work each incur a significant metabolic cost. Specifically, the cost of performing work to redirect and accelerate the center of mass is almost twice as great as the cost of generating force to support body weight.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15649878     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00734.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  56 in total

1.  Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Rodger Kram; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stance and swing phase costs in human walking.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Propulsive Forces Applied to the Body's Center of Mass Affect Metabolic Energetics Poststroke.

Authors:  Kelly Penke; Korre Scott; Yunna Sinskey; Michael D Lewek
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Effect of body weight support on cortical activation during gait in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Ichiro Miyai; Mitsuo Suzuki; Megumi Hatakenaka; Kisou Kubota
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Bionic ankle-foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation.

Authors:  Hugh M Herr; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Alterations in Aerobic Exercise Performance and Gait Economy Following High-Intensity Dynamic Stepping Training in Persons With Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Abigail L Leddy; Mark Connolly; Carey L Holleran; Patrick W Hennessy; Jane Woodward; Ross A Arena; Elliot J Roth; T George Hornby
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  How do low horizontal forces produce disproportionately high torques in human locomotion?

Authors:  Joseph Helseth; Tibor Hortobágyi; Paul Devita
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Walk-run transition in young and older adults: with special reference to the cardio-respiratory responses.

Authors:  P T V Farinatti; W D Monteiro
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Dynamic principles of gait and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-12-18

10.  Effects of aging on mechanical efficiency and muscle activation during level and uphill walking.

Authors:  Justus D Ortega; Claire T Farley
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.