Literature DB >> 18396291

How do low horizontal forces produce disproportionately high torques in human locomotion?

Joseph Helseth1, Tibor Hortobágyi, Paul Devita.   

Abstract

Although horizontal ground forces are only approximately 15% of vertical forces, they account for 47% and 33% of the metabolic cost in walking and running. To explain these disproportionately high metabolic costs, we hypothesized that low horizontal ground forces generate relatively high torques on body segments during locomotion and this is mediated by long moment arms. We compared external force moment arms and discreet torques applied to the body segments by horizontal and vertical forces during walking and running. Sixteen subjects (21.9+/-1.9 years) walked at 1.5m/s and ten subjects (23.2+/-2.0 years) ran at 3.83 m/s. Segmental torques in the sagittal plane were partitioned into components due to horizontal and vertical forces and quantified by their angular impulses. The mean (+/-S.E.) ratios of horizontal to vertical ground forces (GF ratio) and angular impulses (AI ratio) in walking were 0.131 (+/-0.003, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.124-0.137) and 0.530 (+/-0.018, CI 0.497-0.569). Results were similar in running. In both gaits the AI ratios were significantly greater than the GF ratios because the respective CI's did not overlap. The horizontal forces produced 53% and 41% as much angular impulse on the body segments, as did the vertical forces in walking and running despite being only 13% as large. In the two movements the moment arms for the horizontal forces averaged across foot, leg, thigh, and trunk body segments were 3.8 fold larger than those for the vertical forces. The data supported the hypothesis and suggest that the relatively low horizontal vs. vertical forces accounted for a disproportionately higher percentage of the angular impulses placed on the body segments and this effect was due to relatively long moment arms for horizontal forces. These results partially explain the relatively large metabolic cost of generating relatively low horizontal forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18396291      PMCID: PMC2490596          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  29 in total

1.  Kinematic and kinetic comparison of downhill and level walking.

Authors:  M Kuster; S Sakurai; G A Wood
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Energetic cost and preferred speed of walking in obese vs. normal weight women.

Authors:  Raymond C Browning; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-05

3.  Energy absorption of impacts during running at various stride lengths.

Authors:  T R Derrick; J Hamill; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination.

Authors:  C F Munro; D I Miller; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  An assessment of subject variability, subject-shoe interaction, and the evaluation of running shoes using ground reaction force data.

Authors:  B T Bates; L R Osternig; J A Sawhill; S L James
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Overall principle of lower limb support during stance phase of gait.

Authors:  D A Winter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Claire T Farley; Thomas J Roberts; Marco Temaner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-07-16

9.  Energetics of walking and running: insights from simulated reduced-gravity experiments.

Authors:  C T Farley; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-12

10.  Energetics of bipedal running. I. Metabolic cost of generating force.

Authors:  T J Roberts; R Kram; P G Weyand; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  The metabolic and mechanical consequences of altered propulsive force generation in walking.

Authors:  Noah L Pieper; Sidney T Baudendistel; Chris J Hass; Gabriela B Diaz; Rebecca L Krupenevich; Jason R Franz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Effects of gait training with horizontal impeding force on gait and balance of stroke patients.

Authors:  Kyung-Pil Na; You Lim Kim; Suk Min Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.